Hello, Skorodum, you wrote: S> "git blame", "git rebase - interactive", "git stash" in studio already is? With normal ? Is (besides it is much more convenient). If it is necessary - to install additional options that necessary . But we not about an amount of features, and about convenience of usage of the tool in an everyday life. Such integration into any others IDE simply is not present. S> it is ridiculous. All topic about inability of studio to work with different systems of the assembly. Really ridiculous comment. There is no sense to support remaining systems of the assembly if they do not have not that that advantages, but also lacks are present. Nevertheless the studio generally saws support of the same cmake, was initially able. Qt the plug-in can open projects. As they have a wide circulation. You want to laugh even more? How there at other systems of the assembly with support of solutions of studio? Somehow in any way, yes? S> nonsense. is a self-deception. If at you the big project at you ten open files, visual navigation on - the anti-pattern which reduces productivity. Seriously?) )) That is if at me the code before eyes is reduces productivity and if I it do not see - that raises? Similar you simply did not work with them and especially in the multimonitor environment. S> in it is possible to open some editors and to dissolve them on different monitors, only at normal navigation it rarely is necessary https://www.linux.org.ru/images/16134/original.jpg S> Well if to try to pass by means of a mouse - can be yes. But all power in F2 ("Follow symbol under cursor") and a locator (passage to classes, methods, files etc. including fuzzy logic) and passage forward-back as in the browser. Not "by means of a mouse" and "conveniently" are different things. Power not in , they and in studio is. A locator it is simple a dump. Everything that there piled it is necessary to make still conveniently. AS>> and "Peek definition"? S> Horror. In : F2, looked and "alt+left" to return reversely. It generally different things. S> the Studio is a deadlock way of evolution in respect of editing, nobody repeats their approach, and MSEC saw Visual Studio Code. In consists studios? what nobody can repeat their approach? AS>> but! We not consider bare studio, and a standard development environment under with ++? In this case without VAX at all has no sense to compare. S> In-in, without a paid plug-in the studio is not made absolutely not (except for a debugger). Such impression that I communicate with the teenager in maximalism. We consider generally development environments. Studio + VAX always go together. S> If to translate with bird's on normal it appears that the considerable part of it is in Kreatore from a box. Free of charge. . Yes well? Where to me to find at least the first 3 points? In a locator? Suddenly they is not, then find references. S> Well it is clear, as well as in a case with qbs to be beyond the learned template - in any way. We after all adult people and both understand, what the claim "to be beyond the learned template - in any way" means - "could not make"?