1

Topic: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

Is handler.ashx, there is a separate html-file - as  to hammer into it ?
P.S. I hope,  the file from a disk and reads.

2

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

The innocent person behind a board;
Using methods of operation with lines, or

3

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

skyANA wrote:

the Innocent person behind a board;
Using methods of operation with lines, or

Well and ?

4

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

The innocent person behind a board;
The parcer can is necessary, instead of ?
Do not hesitate, more in detail.

5

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

Petro123 wrote:

the Innocent person behind a board;
The parcer can is necessary, instead of ?
Do not hesitate, more in detail.

To me it is necessary  on server side - NOT razor.
Any proved.

6

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

The innocent person behind a board;
https://github.com/rexm/handlebars.net

7

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

big-duke;
Thanks.

8

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

DotLiquid, Nustache. Fluid (it meanwhile in , truth).

9

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

And that - from a disk it is necessary to read contents of a file to me?

10

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

behind a board wrote:

And me that - from a disk it is necessary to read contents of a file?

it is not clear, what in this operation to automate?

11

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

fkthat wrote:

DotLiquid, Nustache. Fluid (it meanwhile in , truth).

All a hogwash.
https://github.com/lunet-io/scriban - IN!

12

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

Petro123 wrote:

it is passed...
It is not clear, what in this operation to automate?

In the first post it is written:

behind a board wrote:

I Hope,  the file from a disk and reads.

Itself learns where files: on local, or a network drive, in what folder, - and a whisker makes:-Q

13

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

Petro123 wrote:

it is passed...
It is not clear, what in this operation to automate?

Look on razor.

14

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

behind a board wrote:

Look on razor.

and you in a topic on what?
So, half  your topic also transit. As was with your question on CMS.
Topic you .

15

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

Petro123 wrote:

So, half  your topic also transit.

, I received answers. Half can go further.

16

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

hVostt wrote:

it is passed...
All a hogwash.
https://github.com/lunet-io/scriban - IN!

... Funny, not clearly, why under  it is so much implementations Liquid - would saw already all together one.

17

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

fkthat wrote:

Hm... Funny, not clearly, why under  it is so much implementations Liquid - would saw already all together one.

Because on this question there is no central line of a batch smile
Well and if to select, it is unambiguous Scriban.

18

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

hVostt wrote:

Well and if to select, it is unambiguous Scriban.

You are serious? Why?

19

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

behind a board wrote:

it is passed...
You are serious? Why?

Convenient, really fast, perfectly expanded.

20

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

hVostt;
and I just would select what to apply thanks.

21

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

hVostt wrote:

it is passed...
Convenient, really fast, perfectly expanded.

Nested templates supports?

22

Re: Easy for ASP - not RAZOR.

skyANA wrote:

Nested templates supports?

Yes.
https://github.com/lunet-io/scriban/blo … e-arg1argn
The cool counter is still, it is possible in a template  a piece in a variable that then it somewhere to interpose some times.