1

Topic: The test of Jagur XE

As though, those who rumpling I know, know, the praise difficultly know what to deserve from me. But it not that case.  it was pleasant to me everything, except a place behind (that is not enough of me ) and a small and narrow luggage carrier (that extremely is not pleasant). In difference from BMW (with  it is explicitly necessary to move in a sport mode) and the Stinger is really goes and  for the speed it is pleasant enough. On small speeds to twist a wheel it is necessary more quickly (that is sad). But for the speed all is quite good. That that was at me was almost without forcemeat, short of a limit of speed and a rear-view camera. The motor 180 . A box of 8 steps, as at Behi. Problems the following: 1. Very narrow pedal of gas (and nearby a wall). Permanently you push by (in nearby salon). 2. Here would not prevent on more horses. 3. Well, there is not enough place behind and in a luggage carrier. In remaining is the best representative of that I tried. Goes - well. The box brakes on a minimum. An interior pleasant. Options are all. Well, one more lack that the configuration demanded to me quits in 3.4 lemons. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NteZ_D-y9I4 and here a type on back sitting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urk5qqlXUG4 Cameras of the circle review in  to the machine were not, but it was in "the big cat". The following video about it and for one about interiors of this biggest cat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc4Qzh3dC8k

2

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> As though, those who rumpling I know, know, the praise difficultly know what to deserve from me. But it not that case.  it was pleasant to me everything, except a place behind (that is not enough of me ) and a small and narrow luggage carrier (that extremely is not pleasant). I here looked at some cats and communicated to owners. The general judgement - the Jaguar very well does the big machines, which very tight inside. As it is possible to them -

3

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> I here looked at some cats and communicated to owners. The general judgement - the Jaguar very well does the big machines, which very tight inside. As it is possible to them - I thought, it is Volvo counter. And in case of Volvo it in explainably thickness , which like a firm counter.

4

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Breaks.

5

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, Gattaka, you wrote: G> Breaks. How many Jaguars  that such to declare?

6

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: G>> Breaks. R> how many Jaguars  that such to declare? It is possible to declare it on the basis of the information from the Internet. But on any it would be desirable to see though any . And that it can about be blurted out anything you like.

7

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> it is possible to declare It on the basis of the information from the Internet. But on any it would be desirable to see though any . And that it can about be blurted out anything you like. Jaguar and Land Rover is the same company. At me already the third LR (were Freelander 2 (it is sold on 60 .), Discovery 4 (is sold on 104 .) and here now, it is literally on Tuesday, visors of the Range Rover Sport). Therefore I can safely declare that a joke about that owners LR with each other do not greet since saw in service - no more than a joke now in the morning. P.S. At me the same washer of a check point was on D4, as at you in the Jaguar on the test. The cool piece, truth few times for 4 years did not want to leave the drowned state

8

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: R> P.S. At me the same washer of a check point was on D4, as at you in the Jaguar on the test. The cool piece, truth few times for 4 years did not want to leave the drowned state And what you thus did?  Frankly speaking to I permanently intuitively searched for the pen and raked up air a hand. It can and cool, but to get used to it it is necessary. I would prefer the normal pen without .

9

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> And here a type on back sitting: VD> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urk5qqlXUG4 Added video from back sitting.

10

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> Also what you thus did? Deafened and got, the problem disappeared. But business was in the winter in a minus 30 so it can and affected. VD> frankly speaking to I permanently intuitively searched for the pen and raked up air a hand. It can and cool, but to get used to it it is necessary. I would prefer the normal pen without . The nonsense is all. The automatic machine is the automatic machine, it it is not necessary, unlike mechanics, permanently to finger forward/back. Villages, pushed a brake, got, included D and removed a foot from a brake. Arrived, pushed a brake, translated a box in a parking. And it is possible and to deafen simply, she in a parking rises (now I about this washer was specific I write).

11

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> I here looked at some cats and communicated to owners. The general judgement - the Jaguar very well does the big machines, which very tight inside. As it is possible to them - Well, I sat in these big machines. And I would not tell that it  are tight inside. More likely they are too long outside. Here video from the big cat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc4Qzh3dC8k

12

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: R> the Automatic machine is the automatic machine, it it is not necessary, unlike mechanics, permanently to finger forward/back. Villages, pushed a brake, got, included D and removed a foot from a brake. Arrived, pushed a brake, translated a box in a parking. And it is possible and to deafen simply, she in a parking rises (now I about this washer was specific I write). When parked in narrow space, it is necessary.

13

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: R> Jaguar and Land Rover is the same company. At me already the third LR (were Freelander 2 (it is sold on 60 .), Discovery 4 (is sold on 104 .) and here now, it is literally on Tuesday, visors of the Range Rover Sport). Therefore I can safely declare that a joke about that owners LR with each other do not greet since saw in service - no more than a joke now in the morning. And my acquaintance 3rd roofing felts 4th Diskaveri sold roofing felts after the check point long to live commanded. Well and that now Hindus do them, does not add optimism.

14

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NteZ_D-y9I4 , but with such technics  I would not advise you a back drive to buy.

15

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, Lexey, you wrote: L> And my acquaintance 3rd roofing felts 4th Diskaveri sold roofing felts after the check point long to live commanded. Well and that now Hindus do them, does not add optimism. Alexey, be not dishonored. I already about it wrote to you, truth in other occasion. 3 and 4 Diskos are different machines though are similar visually. A check point too different, in mine D4 there was an eight-mortar, and in D3 such even nearby was not. Now Hindus of Lend also do not do Rovers, do not compose. Both gathered in Solihalle, and remains, and Hindus - owners of business. It is a bit another. P.S.: If the key moment of possession of a car is money, Toyota the best choice. And if it would be desirable a high from driving or pleasure from comfort, it only premiums-brands. But the service price will be not so comfortable for the majority of hired programmers, even in default city. Knowingly Sharpkoder on Ferrari drives and swears that service tired. But after all does not sell?

16

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, SvoboduAnzheleDevis, you wrote: G>>> Breaks. R>> how many Jaguars  that such to declare? The GARDEN> at the neighbor three . Break. At the neighbor, at the brother-in-law, at the grandmother, at the friend. And at you how many was (new) Jaguars, Mercedes and BMW that you could to sound objective judgement? We argue, any?

17

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: R> Alexey, be not dishonored. Cheap receptions of the demagogue apply to somebody to another. R> I already about it wrote to you, truth in other occasion. 3 and 4 Diskos are different machines though are similar visually. A check point too different, in mine D4 there was an eight-mortar, and in D3 such even nearby was not. What for you to me tell these superfluous details? The fact in that, as that and another is LR. And that at the machine for   the check point so flies that it easier then to sell with the broken box than to repair. R> now Hindus of Lend also do not do Rovers, do not compose. Both gathered in Solihalle, and remains, and Hindus - owners of business. It is a bit another. For you this another, and for me is "that". LR is now Hindus where they would not gather. And quality first of all is defined by control, instead of executors.

18

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: R> Knowingly Sharpkoder on Ferrari drives and swears that service tired. But after all does not sell? Would be at me  - I too on  would brag complained of service.

19

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, Lexey, you wrote: L> What for you to me tell these superfluous details? The fact in that, as that and another is LR. And that at the machine for   the check point so flies that it easier then to sell with the broken box than to repair. Well here again you tell nonsense. Even replacing a check point on contract - machine sale it will be strong more favourably, than sale of that which costs in service and not on the move. Suffices already to write about in what you  do not understand.

20

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: R>> How many Jaguars  that such to declare? VD> it is possible to declare it on the basis of the information from the Internet. But on any it would be desirable to see though any . And that it can about be blurted out anything you like. Yes take, . Then you will tell.

21

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: R> Well here again you tell nonsense. Even replacing a check point on contract - machine sale it will be strong more favourably, than sale of that which costs in service and not on the move. Suffices already to write about in what you  do not understand. Well, my familiar fool, I tell nonsense, and you one clever. Only here, he sold the machine for couple of days, and almost at once bought the new. Instead of waited for figs knows what is the time while bring contract a check point both produce changeover. Also did not tell then to the potential buyer, what with machine all is remarkable, only here it was necessary to replace a box with a pig in a poke (as you think, would be wishing it much to buy thus?). Also did not risk then to receive claims if this contract the check point is covered with a copper basin.

22

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, Lexey, you wrote: L> Well, my familiar fool, I tell nonsense, and you one clever. I do not intend to communicate with you herein.

23

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, rkcsoft, you wrote: R> I do not intend to communicate with you herein. Here and remarkably.

24

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD>> As though, those who rumpling I know, know, the praise difficultly know what to deserve from me. But it not that case.  it was pleasant to me everything, except a place behind (that is not enough of me ) and a small and narrow luggage carrier (that extremely is not pleasant). L> I here looked at some cats and communicated to owners. The general judgement - the Jaguar very well does the big machines, which very tight inside. As it is possible to them - Probiroval as that XF, at old course, very much even was spacious. In Volvo S60 too narrowness did not experience

25

Re: The test of Jagur XE

Hello, swame, you wrote: L>> I here looked at some cats and communicated to owners. The general judgement - the Jaguar very well does the big machines, which very tight inside. As to them it is possible - S> to Probiroval as that XF, at old course, very much even was spacious. The luggage carrier entered us at once into despondency. Outwardly and generally  it is pleasant, but the practicality limps.