1

Topic:

> At  the patient involuntarily has persuasive, hindering or frightening thoughts (so-called ). He permanently and unsuccessfully tries to get rid of the alarm caused by thoughts by means of so persuasive and tiresome actions (). I here think, and it const generally is connected somehow const const const to fear of any potential const const and even   const const const const const? Why alarm hyper-compensating replaced to people culture of development? They therefore are afraid of a python and select  because in last is  syntax elements.

2

Re:

Hello, neFormal, you wrote: F> Why alarm hyper-compensating replaced to people culture of development? F> they therefore are afraid of a python and select  because in last is  syntax elements. Of a python are afraid not because in it is not present  syntax elements that is why that can gobble up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVRhRzE_AkQ

3

Re:

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: F>> Why alarm hyper-compensating replaced to people culture of development? F>> they therefore are afraid of a python and select  because in last is  syntax elements. S> a python are afraid not because in it is not present  syntax elements that is why that can gobble up. Already not for long remains. Guido died left, now clear up!

4

Re:

F> Why alarm hyper-compensating replaced to people culture of development? It not alarm hypercompensating, and as a matter of fact a variety compile-time assert'. WHICH in turn help to catch the bugs at a stage of compilation and to  are a component of the self-documented code.

5

Re:

Hello, ononim, you wrote: F>> Why alarm hyper-compensating replaced to people culture of development? O> it not alarm hypercompensating, and as a matter of fact a variety compile-time assert'. WHICH in turn help to catch the bugs at a stage of compilation and to  are a component of the self-documented code. It would be so if it was necessary in each case. But after all write permanently "just in case". I.e. they do not know still, in what conditions there will be their code. It causes fear and a tremor of extremities.

6

Re:

F> it would be so if it was necessary in each case. F> but after all write permanently "just in case". I.e. they do not know still, in what conditions there will be their code. It causes fear and a tremor of extremities. Well if the variable algorithmically is not supposed to change then it is necessary to mark it const. And why it so disturbs you?

7

Re:

Hello, ononim, you wrote: F>> it would be so if it was necessary in each case. F>> but after all write permanently "just in case". I.e. they do not know still, in what conditions there will be their code. It causes fear and a tremor of extremities. O> well if the variable algorithmically is not supposed to change then it is necessary to mark it const. And why it so disturbs you? When you start to speak about something with , he quickly jumps off from arguing of the task and starts to finger const' and I watch, as in other languages climbs through this psychosis. With it it is necessary to do something while we did not sink in attempts to be protected from unknown danger

8

Re:

Hello, ononim, you wrote: O> a component of the self-documented code. The self-documented code does not happen

9

Re:

Hello, neFormal, you wrote:>> At  the patient involuntarily has persuasive, hindering or frightening thoughts (so-called ). He permanently and unsuccessfully tries to get rid of the alarm caused by thoughts by means of so persuasive and tiresome actions (). F> I here think, and it const generally is connected somehow const const const to fear of any potential const const and even   const const const const const? F> Why alarm hyper-compensating replaced to people culture of development? I think that the alarm arises what even 5 const act in film the only thing const_cast <>. To lower alarm level, I offer contain change in language to remove const it was necessary so much time, how many in the declaration. It brings additional feeling of safety