1

Topic: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

How you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? I consider that is necessary. Appropriate voting: http://rsdn.org/poll/6545 the Author: RussianFellow Date: 02.07 11:10 Question: whether the public censure for immoral acts Is necessary?

2

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? And how you represent it to yourself? "Censure" process. The Pillory?

3

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? RF> I consider that is necessary. No therefore as quickly turns to inquisition fires.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

4

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> And how you represent it to yourself? "Censure" process. The Pillory? I think begin with a fork of the heretic as already was.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

5

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? RF> I consider that is necessary. It and without "is necessary/not it is necessary" and so or is, or is not present. And if any legislatively certain censure, this not so public, and according to the law something imposed as public means.

6

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? RF> I consider that is necessary. RF> Appropriate voting: RF> http://rsdn.org/poll/6545 the Author: RussianFellow Date: 02.07 11:10 Question: whether the public censure for immoral acts Is necessary? Thanks for an interesting question

7

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: Why there is no adding of the variants? Be afraid that over you again begin ? I wanted to add a variant "It is necessary to oblige all citizens to go in public transport". It would solve all problems, in my opinion.

8

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

K> It would solve all problems, in my opinion. Unless the public censure should solve all problems?

9

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? RF> I consider that is necessary. If the society blames, also an act immoral. One troubles of another does not happen

10

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

RF>> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? RF>> I consider that is necessary. M> If the society blames, also an act immoral. One troubles of another does not happen if a society densely to pour tolerance, it can and shut up, despite well, moderately my understanding

11

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

I think it is necessary. It is especially necessary to blame obscurantists.

12

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> I Think it is necessary. It is especially necessary to blame obscurantists. Some it  censure does not influence, it is better to punish rouble

13

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? To begin with it is necessary to understand that such are immoral an act and why it is blamed. There is a judgement that all it has been reached during evolution of social groups (group evolution) for increase of chances of a survival. Now many "evolutionary experts" tend to revising, therefore the question of immorality of this or that act costs in doubt.

14

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, RussianFellow, you wrote: RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? RF> I consider that is necessary. To begin with announce the list of "immoral acts".

15

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, mishasokolovw, you wrote: vsb>> I Think it is necessary. It is especially necessary to blame obscurantists. M> some it  censure does not influence, the Good idea is better to punish rouble. Church .

16

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

RF> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? Such already was in the recent spiritless past. You want to return it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Au8SJTn6Mmo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx1RqRQl2pw

17

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, Iron Monkey, you wrote: IM> Such already was in the recent spiritless past. You want to return it? As though, in the old spiritual past of it was not. Offset of accents of immorality - here and all difference, and a public censure anywhere does not get to.

18

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: A>> And how you represent it to yourself? "Censure" process. The Pillory? CC> I think begin with a fork of the heretic as already was. I think, when " on " carried out from kitchens on tribunes innocent victims turned out too many. So  to name immoral acts immoral it is possible and it is necessary. That villains always remembered, what response by it to expect.

19

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: RF>> As you consider, dear colleagues, whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary? RF>> I consider that is necessary. CC> Is not present, therefore as quickly turns to inquisition fires. How in Odessa on 2nd of May 2014?

20

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> To begin with announce the list of "immoral acts". What for? You and consult: http://www.rsdn.org/forum/flame/7188131.1 do not hesitate, cover still.

21

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: V> I Think, when " on " carried out from kitchens on tribunes innocent victims turned out too many. V> so  to name immoral acts immoral it is possible and it is necessary. V> That villains always remembered, what response by it to expect. Do not quit the Policy to live people please.... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

22

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: CC>> Is not present, therefore as quickly turns to inquisition fires. V> as in Odessa on 2nd of May 2014? At you in a head .... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>

23

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: V>> I Think, when " on " carried out from kitchens on tribunes innocent victims turned out too many. V>> so  to name immoral acts immoral it is possible and it is necessary. V>> That villains always remembered, what response by it to expect. CC> do not quit the Policy to live people please. Close a mouth, please.

24

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, CreatorCray, you wrote: CC>>> Is not present, therefore as quickly turns to inquisition fires. V>> as in Odessa on 2nd of May 2014? CC> At you in a head . You already the fifth time for half-day became personal. The uncle, you the fool?

25

Re: Whether the public censure for immoral acts is necessary?

Hello, vdimas, you wrote: CC>> do not quit the Policy to live people please. V> Close a mouth, please. You truth think that your judgement after these  whom or seriously interests?... <<RSDN@Home 1.0.0 alpha 5 rev. 0>>