1

Topic: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

2

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> Children liked to hang out at forums and to arrest defenseless women Poor, defenseless , now I will burst into tears with pity.

3

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: [] Something  on a seam rolls with a poppy pulled.

4

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> Children liked to hang out at forums and to arrest defenseless women business Excitation by the current moment cancelled. But generally, mummy too is good. I read that history in on change.org That interesting, on rbc words picked up more accurately since in the petition there was a specific jamb: Ekaterina Konnova, Arseny's mum, in group  bought these microenemas. 20 pieces, on 1000  for a piece. Since the spasm at Arseny every day, and in a family does not suffice money, in the Children's hospice "the House with a beacon" to Ekaterina recommended to receive through polyclinic free of charge  in ampoules and to use it. Mum and made. And 5 enemas which remained with it, decided to resell at the same forum to other parents of children with an epilepsy to return at least a part of money. To both th, the medicine could be received absolutely free of charge and legally. Instead it it is explicit without consultation of the doctor (differently at once received the recipe on ampoules) buys somewhere at the medicine with a drug is not known whom and gives to the child, though, from the instruction: Application  at children till 14 years is admissible only in accurately well-founded cases, duration of treatment should be minimum. At reception  (even in therapeutic doses) accustoming development, formation of physical and mental dependence is possible. The risk of origin of dependence increases at usage of heavy doses and with magnification of duration of reception... Cases  narcotisms Are described. Well also sells then as to whom got.

5

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> Moscow instead of Kazan Instead of answering my question on systematic prosecution of seamstresses in Kazan This time was marked created a new subject.

6

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> Children liked to hang out at forums and to arrest defenseless women Yes women all right...  with them...

7

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, fmiracle, you wrote: F> to both th, the medicine could be received absolutely free of charge and legally. Instead it it is explicit without consultation of the doctor (differently at once received the recipe on ampoules) buys somewhere at the medicine with a drug is not known whom and gives to the child, though, from the instruction: You tried to receive medicines free of charge?

8

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, biochemist, you wrote: B> Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M>> Moscow instead of Kazan B> Instead of answering my question on systematic prosecution of seamstresses in Kazan This time was marked created a new subject. Systematic exceedings of powers of the employee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Kazan you and do not want to recognize? What difference whom pursue - seamstresses or not seamstresses.

9

Re: And again about to operation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> Systematic exceedings of powers of the employee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in Kazan you and do not want to recognize? On the base of pair notices smelling as naphthalene? Cleanings in organs are regular. Most likely, the mentioned frames swinging crusts "" the Veteran of the Ministry of Internal Affairs "beat out debts from the suckers who have taken the credit on" favourable conditions ". M> What difference whom pursue - seamstresses or not seamstresses. There is a good saying in which"difference"is rhymed with"". Plaints in protection  (let and involuntary) are not clear and there and then - do not hinder to trade in that is not forbidden. How it can be combined?