1

Topic: Intended errors in the code help to be protected from hackers

The American researchers offered the unusual approach to software protection - intentionally to add in the code of the program of an error. They created system which automatically adds in the code set of errors, but such which cannot lead to real vulnerability but only to program termination or other noncritical problems. https://nplus1.ru/news/2018/08/07/chaff-bugs

2

Re: Intended errors in the code help to be protected from hackers

Hello, Alexander G, you wrote: AG> AG> the American researchers offered the unusual approach to software protection - intentionally to add in the code of the program of an error. They created system which automatically adds in the code set of errors, but such which cannot lead to real vulnerability but only to program termination or other noncritical problems. AG> https://nplus1.ru/news/2018/08/07/chaff-bugs well, to the knocking lock it is more difficult to pick up a master key for not always clearly: whether the master key does not approach, whether the lock .

3

Re: Intended errors in the code help to be protected from hackers

Hello, Alexander G, you wrote: AG> AG> the American researchers offered the unusual approach to software protection - intentionally to add in the code of the program of an error. They created system which automatically adds in the code set of errors, but such which cannot lead to real vulnerability but only to program termination or other noncritical problems. AG> https://nplus1.ru/news/2018/08/07/chaff-bugs I know set of cases when the such was applied in the same . And itself applied: at key and certificate check - instead of immediate cessation of work wrote down superfluous  in structures  storages. The program crashed down after some seconds, during almost casual time.

4

Re: Intended errors in the code help to be protected from hackers

AG> the American researchers offered the unusual approach to software protection - intentionally to add in the code of the program of an error. They created system which automatically adds in the code set of errors, but such which cannot lead to real vulnerability but only to program termination or other noncritical problems. And some hackers do not sew creation of a harmful software?