1

Topic: Old age

How you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times?

2

Re: Old age

Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? No. It only imaginations 2

3

Re: Old age

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I>> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? A> is not present. It only imaginations 2 On how many I understand now a natural boundary of 70-90 years. We assume we win a cancer (the main disease indicating a boundary) Not panacea? Regeneration of sick cells, immunity maintenance, really is not present methods?

4

Re: Old age

I> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? Personally I would prefer, that as in a film "time". You stick in 25 years and all. Then time came to an end also greetings.

5

Re: Old age

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: I>> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? K> personally I would prefer, that as in a film "time". You stick in 25 years and all. Then time came to an end also greetings. When time will be on an outcome you will tear and throw that something to change Here a question of other character, we learned to treat many illnesses, coped with epidemics, but aging and life expectancy practically does not move

6

Re: Old age

Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I> When time will be on an outcome you will tear and throw that something to change Here a question of other character, we learned to treat many illnesses, coped with epidemics, but aging and life expectancy practically does not move the Second law of thermodynamics, whether see.

7

Re: Old age

I> When time will be on an outcome you will tear and throw that something to change Here a question of other character, we learned to treat many illnesses, coped with epidemics, but aging and life expectancy practically does not move yes a pancake a cancer any we can not win. Even  learned to stop, and the cancer is not present. And you about an old age. Savelyev considers that it is in essence impossible. To exceed number of divisions of a cell. A hardwired constant. Though you  quits nothing. Type therefore and the cloning is utopian.

8

Re: Old age

I> On how many I understand now a natural boundary of 70-90 years. We assume we win a cancer (the main disease indicating a boundary) Not panacea? Regeneration of sick cells, immunity maintenance, really is not present methods? Well we admit win. Further ? The big odds? 30 superfluous years of existence to turn to a morel and to die in a bed fighting in an agony. And now compare these 30 years with . It of that costs?

9

Re: Old age

K> Savelyev considers that it is in essence impossible. To exceed number of divisions of a cell. A hardwired constant. Though you  quits nothing. Type therefore and the cloning is utopian. Here when a constant alter on the - then and it will be possible to talk.

10

Re: Old age

Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? No. It is a lot of  to thirty better. Then scientists for you will not enter anything.

11

Re: Old age

CP> Is not present. It is a lot of  to thirty better. Then scientists for you will not enter anything. To 30 it is a little small. I  probably already would become gloomy

12

Re: Old age

Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? I think, the next two hundred years. Gene engineering and so on. Well it or is bad - other question.

13

Re: Old age

Hello, alpha21264, you wrote: A> Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I>> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? A> I think, the next two hundred years. Gene engineering and so on. Well it or is bad - other question. Most likely it is bad, as it will be accessible only to rich men. Approximately as now everyones  change hearts on 6 times, remaining  for which it is really necessary, stand in a queue

14

Re: Old age

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> Is not present. It only imaginations 2 is finite.  prevents, as already made with the Babel tower.

15

Re: Old age

Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? I think that the question is quite achievable in  to perspective... The question in that that among population a heap of garbage which is useless and even is harmful from the point of view as the power  and populations as a whole - whether there will be a segregation on useful and is not present... Also what to do with useless?

16

Re: Old age

Hello, The Passenger, you wrote: TP> also what to do with useless? I would be disturbed more by whom who will solve is useful, and who is not present...  on Yandex. A disk

17

Re: Old age

Hello, Anton Batenev, you wrote: AB> I would be disturbed more by whom who will solve is useful, and who is not present... The System solves. From venture capitalists to tramps and criminals: four levels of hierarchy in San Francisco https://vc.ru/43230-ot-venchurnyh-kapit … -francisko

18

Re: Old age

Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? What for? Only it seems to you that you want it. To begin with understand that there is I which you want to save. Also think what in it logical sense. What do you want to save was specific?

19

Re: Old age

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> What for? Only it seems to you that you want it. To begin with understand that there is I which you want to save. Also think what in it logical sense. Why in desires there should be a logical sense? Life is senseless, desires and fill with its sense.

20

Re: Old age

Hello, isd73jhf, you wrote: I> As you consider in  1000 mankind can come to immortality or at least increase life expectancy in 2-3 times? 1000 - the big period, very big. And generally I doubt that it basically is possible. But if can twice can and indefinitely. If can, not the fact that the mankind with it generally consults. All the same brains of the person are ground on finite life, from infinite and it is possible to go balmy. Probably simply all go balmy and die, and the mankind on it comes to an end.

21

Re: Old age

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > Why in desires there should be a logical sense? Life is senseless, desires and fill with its sense. To declare that sense is not present or that the sense is - it is necessary to see all pattern. You while know it is not enough, can is simple do not realize it. Interesting that the majority of desires logical. For example, men normally like women and they have desire with them to approach. It, on the strange coincidence of circumstances, leads to a birth of children. Strange, yes? The desire is As though simple and leads to certain important consequences. Your desire "to live eternally" - simply error. You only want to satisfy a saving instinct, but were a little tangled, since do not understand that for saving of a type and for saving information/skills - it is better to die to you. So the system will be more reliable. At intuitive level you realize that not simply chemistry and you have certain I, a certain soul. But after all the soul is saved after death and for its eternal  anything it is not necessary to do, unless is not present?