Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> Bush expressed in English correctly enough. LVV> and our translators (if really translated interview) simply expressed, as the Goblin. Imaginations began. LVV> so NYT quite could publish. Something not concerning completely not to the text under your link if there generally there is a tradition to the president to give interview to the separate newspaper what I strongly doubt. LVV> I also ask - the English source exists? It not to me, I will not search for an English source. It it is necessary to search either in library or in digitized archive NYT, hardly for access to it free if it exists. The interview text is completely invented, it enough that does not work and not to search, whether irrespective of Bush those days interview NYT gave. LVV> You not answer the asked question, moreover try to lower me... LVV> it is bad. Is for what therefore and it is good and it is useful. Here really itself you can not estimate a level the text?