1

Topic: Bush's interview...

Muzhiks! In various Russian-speaking forums-blogs-sites interview to Dzhorzhem Bush - the senior walks. Here, for example: https://cont.ws / Grand/1026700 the source Is specified: It is possible to look at The New York Times of 10/21/1992, it was real or not? From September till December.

2

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> In various Russian-speaking forums-blogs-sites interview to Dzhorzhem Bush - the senior walks. LVV> it is possible to look, it was real or not? What for delirium - you about Bzhezinsky? Rural little fool Jimmy in the politician could not distinguish an apple from the cow flat cake and consequently listened to idiots and clowns. This Polish  with the ... Valery Viktorovich, well though slightly  it is necessary to be Even if the president would survive from mind and told it all the same NYT never it would publish.

3

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> Muzhiks! LVV> in various Russian-speaking forums-blogs-sites interview to Dzhorzhem Bush - the senior walks. LVV> here, for example: https://cont.ws / Grand/1026700 What that game

4

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, sharpcoder, you wrote: S> What that game On cont.ws and suddenly game?  a bundle.> a fake likely.> can be. But thought and estimations correct

5

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> Muzhiks! LVV> in various Russian-speaking forums-blogs-sites interview to Dzhorzhem Bush - the senior walks. Well certainly truth! Unless can be differently at Russian-speaking "forums-blogs-sites"?

6

Re: Bush's interview...

P> That for delirium it is not necessary to be such categorical. You the programmer or not? At first - the analysis, and then outputs. P> P> - you about Bzhezinsky? Rural little fool Jimmy in the politician could not distinguish an apple from the cow flat cake and consequently listened to idiots and clowns. This Polish  with the ... P> Valery Viktorovich, well though slightly  it is necessary to be This estimate opinion... P> Even if the president would survive from mind and told it all the same NYT never it would publish. And now look, AS it could be. Bush expressed in English correctly enough. And our translators (if really translated interview) simply expressed, as the Goblin. So NYT quite could publish. I also ask - the English source exists? Instead of how it wrote in Russian. You not answer the asked question, moreover try to lower me... Badly.

7

Re: Bush's interview...

LVV>> Muzhiks! LVV>> in various Russian-speaking forums-blogs-sites interview to Dzhorzhem Bush - the senior walks. LVV>> here, for example: https://cont.ws / Grand/1026700 S> What that the game Walks - for a long time. I some times in different places came across. You can answer an initial question?

8

Re: Bush's interview...

LVV>> Muzhiks! LVV>> in various Russian-speaking forums-blogs-sites interview to Dzhorzhem Bush - the senior walks. T> well certainly truth! Unless can be differently at Russian-speaking "forums-blogs-sites"? Mr. the Twister, I ask you not about Russian blogs, and about the English primary source. You can not answer - not  a glade...

9

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> It is possible to look, it was real or not? LVV> From September till December. Here it is possible to rummage: https://www.nytimes.com/search?endDate= … e=19920901

10

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> Bush expressed in English correctly enough. LVV> and our translators (if really translated interview) simply expressed, as the Goblin. Imaginations began. LVV> so NYT quite could publish. Something not concerning completely not to the text under your link if there generally there is a tradition to the president to give interview to the separate newspaper what I strongly doubt. LVV> I also ask - the English source exists? It not to me, I will not search for an English source. It it is necessary to search either in library or in digitized archive NYT, hardly for access to it free if it exists. The interview text is completely invented, it enough that does not work and not to search, whether irrespective of Bush those days interview NYT gave. LVV> You not answer the asked question, moreover try to lower me... LVV> it is bad. Is for what therefore and it is good and it is useful. Here really itself you can not estimate a level  the text?

11

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, pagid, you wrote: LVV>> Bush expressed in English correctly enough. LVV>> and our translators (if really translated interview) simply expressed, as the Goblin. P> imaginations began. Read this interview as now I remember - that rustic booby, Jimmy, could not tell an apple from a cow pat in politics and leaned to idiots and clowns.

12

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, Lazar Beshkenadze, you wrote: LVV>>> Bush expressed in English correctly enough. LVV>>> and our translators (if really translated interview) simply expressed, as the Goblin. P>> imaginations began. > Read this interview as now I remember - that rustic booby, Jimmy, could not tell an apple from a cow pat in politics and leaned to idiots and clowns. How so quitted, what Google on these phrases does not find anything?

13

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, Kerk, you wrote: >> Read this interview as now I remember - that rustic booby, Jimmy, could not tell an apple from a cow pat in politics and leaned to idiots and clowns. K> As so quitted, what Google on these phrases does not find anything? Yes well you! At the time of Obama such hunting behind this number NYT was - already here shooting was audible. All to the last number was exhausted by a black devil and a white witch. And from Internet, especially from indexes Google - do not make laugh me.

14

Re: Bush's interview...

LVV> It is possible to look, it was real or not? It is possible. Look.

15

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, Lazar Beshkenadze, you wrote: >>> Read this interview as now I remember - that rustic booby, Jimmy, could not tell an apple from a cow pat in politics and leaned to idiots and clowns. K>> As so quitted, what Google on these phrases does not find anything? > Yes well you! At the time of Obama such hunting behind this number NYT was - already here shooting was audible. All to the last number was exhausted by a black devil and a white witch. And from Internet, especially from indexes Google - do not make laugh me. Well it is ridiculous

16

Re: Bush's interview...

V> Here it is possible to rummage: https://www.nytimes.com/search?endDate= … e=19920901 Thanks. There the short notice. The full article - want a subscription.

17

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: LVV> It is possible to look, it was real or not? Where you find such delirium? Even if not to concern the mentioned lexicon, only expression "consequences of development of ultramodern information technologies" tell at once one that it is a fake. Was not in 1992 information technologies. There were only computers - computers.

18

Re: Bush's interview...

Hello, LaptevVV, you wrote: V>> Here it is possible to rummage: https://www.nytimes.com/search?endDate= … e=19920901 LVV> Thanks. LVV> there the short notice. LVV> the full article - want a subscription. There like there is no interview to date on October, 21st.