1

Topic: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Situation: I went on a bicycle along the road right edge, there there was an entrance to a court yard, the machine there turned. I it did not see, but experienced the close driving behind, and then the driver also gave a signal. I returned and he began to ask loudly what  signaled. In the answer me called the four-eyes, suggested to twist pedals, informed at them here 130 strong guys nearby, and also that I should go on sidewalk, and passing a pedestrian crossing to dismount. I suggested to esteem rules, but, apparently, have not been heard. A question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? Generally I am normal in such cases I go further. And while for me looks so that and it was necessary to make. Anything I am positive similar did not achieve. Whether there was generally a chance to achieve though any positive results?

2

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > I it did not see, but experienced the close driving behind, and then the driver also gave a signal. > I returned and he began to ask loudly what  signaled. > the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? Whether > There was generally a chance to achieve though any positive results? You made all incorrectly! It was necessary to suggest to drink. Then there would be that your opponent - the class muzhik, and generally friends would become. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djGa71cPvD4

3

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

> the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? To hammer and go further. The sense in disassemblings in essence is, if you have to to coexist with this person as that further. Misunderstanding and conflicts should be resolved in the family, with colleagues, neighbors. If in it to be engaged with each casual person no forces and nerves suffices.

4

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

It is possible to beat this driver. If it turns out - it for a long time remembers this case. Truth can not turn out

5

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

> the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? To pass to contact lenses: a minus one occasion to what  and generally  it is frequent . And the size of the machine is proportional to a cube of length of a member often I watch. A crossroads. Pass on green, and this wants to turn the swine. By rules owe the pedestrian going on a zebra on the green should pass, and this full of holes begins  and to signal. Desire at once to take a brick and  in a window. But a province... Do not understand....

6

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? To flood gas and to jump on his head, keys from a car to take away and throw out in the river. Whether > There was generally a chance to achieve though any positive results? No. To cattle only a whip, and at you it is not present.

7

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? There are two correct variants. 1. To hammer and leave. 2. In a pointed manner to get phone, to type 02 and loudly to inform "the driver of the car state number  at turn on adjoining territory did not make way and (hardly was not) made collision with the bicyclist following in a passing direction". And then easy to explain  to a companion that it (was) in a semisecond from  that is necessary in a head not only to eat and that any mythical 100500 strong guys nearby to it do not help. Select any. But the first is more correct.

8

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> to pass to contact lenses: a minus one occasion to what  On  very many go in points that a dust and insects did not fly to eyes.

9

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: >> the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? L> there are two correct variants. L> 1. To hammer and leave. L> 2. In a pointed manner to get phone, to type 02 and loudly to inform "the driver of the car state number  at turn on adjoining territory did not make way and (hardly was not) made collision with the bicyclist following in a passing direction". And then easy to explain  to a companion that it (was) in a semisecond from  that is necessary in a head not only to eat and that any mythical 100500 strong guys nearby to it do not help. You on 02 tell "continue thanks observation, we take measures". From what  a companion also what to do further? To convince him to wait the dress of traffic police a pair of clocks?

10

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: U> From what  a companion also what to do further? What to do further - let already a companion solves. U> to convince him to wait the dress of traffic police a pair of clocks? Let itself solves, but  road accident places  the minimum is for the present punished by deprivation.

11

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> 2. In a pointed manner to get phone, to type 02 and loudly to inform "the driver of the car state number  at turn on adjoining territory did not make way and (hardly was not) made collision with the bicyclist following in a passing direction". And then easy to explain  to a companion that it (was) in a semisecond from  that is necessary in a head not only to eat and that any mythical 100500 strong guys nearby to it do not help. Yes not the fool it also understands that any here  is not present, cops on hardly was do not go also your home conflict because of that he demanded advantage not supposed to it to rules I will not resolve. And if "hardly was" to pass that a radish there will be you. If does not happen to road accident cops unconditionally leave on the message on the drunk driver, but you will not say lies. Yes, if to call cops, it does not get to fight, but it and did not climb, it would be any extreme.

12

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Yes not the fool he also understands, informed at them here 130 strong guys nearby, and also that I should go on sidewalk, and passing a pedestrian crossing to dismount Actually  the fool. And fools should be treated or isolated.  to the bicyclist at turn in a court yard there will be only an idiot.

13

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> Let itself solves, but  road accident places  the minimum is for the present punished by deprivation. Road accident was unless?

14

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> Actually  the fool. And fools should be treated or isolated. He or does not know rules, or simply self-confident impudent fellow, but most likely both that and another. L> Bibikat to the bicyclist at turn in a court yard will be only the idiot. Not the idiot, and considering impudence the second happiness. Pair-triple times in the same way slightly clashed with drivers, but I was the pedestrian, and they left on sidewalk to go round a pool, hollows. Not in city cent certainly, and on silent and not so well-groomed small streets. Also . Normal impudent fellows considering that before them all should part. By the way, though till now roads are far from an ideal, but such places where by machines would leave on sidewalk much more perhaps less became, and road nevertheless is sensitive better a steel, especially big pools fixed, and hated the liberal public borders from  parts separated sidewalks.

15

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, pagid, you wrote: L>> Actually  the fool. And fools should be treated or isolated. P> he or does not know rules, or simply self-confident impudent fellow, but most likely both that and another. Differently, the fool.

16

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Unforgiver, you wrote: L>> Let itself solves, but  road accident places  the minimum is for the present punished by deprivation. U> road accident was unless? And it will be already solved by the inspector. For now a companion can stand, think of the transitory. And can spit and leave. And then  any police machine But I knowingly wrote that the correct variant of actions absolutely another. All fools to treat  it will be broken off. The second variant needs to be connected only in the event that the future passenger of public transport strongly .

17

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > Generally I am normal in such cases I go further. And while for me looks so that and it was necessary to make. Anything I am positive similar did not achieve. Whether > There was generally a chance to achieve though any positive results? The more bicyclists on roads, the above culture of driving at motorists.

18

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Vladek, you wrote: V> The more bicyclists on roads, The they would like to use foul language more.

19

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? To argue on cognac who is right, and then together to read traffic regulations

20

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > I went on a bicycle along the road right edge, there there was an entrance to a court yard, the machine there turned. The muzhik is, of course, wrong. But I do not love bicyclists. If there is no selected band, and do not hold a high-speed mode you all create noises on a band, even moving on the right. Itself I try not to go by a bicycle on roads with a limit from 60 km/h, because this suicide. Some drivers simply do not see you, because their brain got used to see only objects in size with the car. Formally you have a right to go on road, but create thus a noise to drivers.

21

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Roma Mik, you wrote: > the Question: how correctly to conduct itself in such situation? I as though made. It was enveloped on a signal, would raise an eyebrow, a nod upwards. Type "and, ?" Would see answer gestures. If they cultural would smile, a finger upwards or "", and would go further. If they uncivilized would grin, would make a head "oh, well !", and would go further. It you should clash for no reason?

22

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, komod, you wrote: K> the Muzhik is, of course, wrong. But I do not love bicyclists. If there is no selected band, and do not hold a high-speed mode you all create noises on a band, even moving on the right. Itself I try not to go by a bicycle on roads with a limit from 60 km/h, because this suicide. Some drivers simply do not see you, because their brain got used to see only objects in size with the car. Formally you have a right to go on road, but create thus a noise to drivers. And drivers to me create what noises... At them truth too the formal right to go on road is. About same as at me.

23

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> It is possible to beat this driver. If it turns out - it for a long time remembers this case. Truth can not turn out Then the bicyclist for a long time remembers. Too PROFIT!

24

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, landerhigh, you wrote: L> (hardly was not) made collision "Hardly was" it is not considered.

25

Re: How correctly to conduct itself(himself) if someone is wrong?

Hello, Kaifa, you wrote: K> often I watch. A crossroads. Pass on green, and this wants to turn the swine. By rules owe the pedestrian going on a zebra on the green should pass, and this full of holes begins  and to signal. Desire at once to take a brick and  in a window. But a province... Do not understand.... To Approach from outside  and to ask, whether for a long time it had to color the machine of that on a body a nail insulting  harrowed.