1

Topic: As the approach to information changes

Earlier we watched at forums strict sharing on categories (forum sections) and  on time (at the best on a rating, but it is rare). Even the most little-known person has not been deprived by attention - all subjects formed in turn is not dependent on authority. Noted a trend on  later. Since one message can affect at once some subject categories (forum sections) application of tags seemed to more logical. Well and already subscribers to this or that tag received the information. Now all changes. Certainly, old   it does not affect. And here take services with millions users where in a second hundreds posts are published. Absolutely other approach to  the data - on a scene quits a certain relevance. The right to be heard it is necessary to deserve! You can publish video or a post - but anybody about it does not learn. It does not appear in the general list as equals.  it is used (or its more curve variant - a tape with  the data), but the first are accessible only n pages. All who more low - without chances of attention. In the same searcher Google on a keyword you do not come on 1000 page, even if a word popular. The first will be heard only n (for Google Search 30 pages are accessible only!). Absolutely other game rules, it turns out.

2

Re: As the approach to information changes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xekVUsyKCLk

3

Re: As the approach to information changes

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Now all changes. Certainly, old   it does not affect. And here take services with millions users where in a second hundreds posts are published. Absolutely other approach to  the data - on a scene quits a certain relevance. The right to be heard it is necessary to deserve! You can publish video or a post - but anybody about it does not learn. It does not appear in the general list as equals. Yes, relevance. And moreover, controlled output. Here it is interesting to me how to implement relevance and on a centralized basis-operated output in decentral P2P networks (which either already is or soon appear). Is what  thoughts in this respect?

4

Re: As the approach to information changes

S> Even the most little-known person has not been deprived by attention - all subjects formed in turn is not dependent on authority. S> now all changes.> the right to be heard it is necessary to deserve! You can publish video or a post - but anybody about it does not learn. It does not appear in the general list as equals. As soon as, thanks to heroic efforts of "clever men" to live begins better and more cheerfully - density of population sharply increases, number - skips for "a barrier of Dunbar", and earlier impractical "" - receive chance to take a revenge. Instead of "wise and worthy" the real power falls in hands to simulators-prisposoblentsam. Simply because they understand a great bulk of the population and "" is better.  on a march. The crowd filling all feeding landscape functionally illiterate itself gobbles up the children.

5

Re: As the approach to information changes

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> Even the most little-known person has not been deprived by attention S> Heard there will be only the first n S> Absolutely other game rules, it turns out. On dustbins like  and 100 - yes. But same commerce - "" it is necessary to gain money, and how if "all are equal"?? At additional expense you can appear "slightly "! And such interested persons - thousand, therefore if you - "the simple user", do not calculate to write the calculator and "" itself to advance! Marketing is a whole semiscientific direction where study for years.

6

Re: As the approach to information changes

Hello, Shmj, you wrote: S> the Right to be heard it is necessary to deserve! You can publish video or a post - but anybody about it does not learn. It does not appear in the general list as equals. Not to deserve, and to buy - in it the purpose  consists.

7

Re: As the approach to information changes

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> here it is interesting To me how to implement relevance and on a centralized basis-operated output in decentral P2P networks (which either already is or soon appear). Is what  thoughts in this respect? The user has a list of friends. Its friends have friends (all is signed ). It is possible to add a circle still, probably. In your tape there are messages of all these friends and the message, which they  . If you , at you it disappeared. If many your friends , it too disappears. Well there coefficients probably any will, there can be more granular sharing (from that I want to read technical posts, but not political) and , it already to a detail. It is, of course, not centralized output, but unless it is necessary in a decentral network? - Precisely it is not necessary for me.

8

Re: As the approach to information changes

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> the user has a list of friends. Its friends have friends (all is signed ). It is possible to add a circle still, probably. In your tape there are messages of all these friends and the message, which they  . If you , at you it disappeared. If many your friends , it too disappears. Well there coefficients probably any will, there can be more granular sharing (from that I want to read technical posts, but not political) and , it already to a detail. vsb> it is, of course, not centralized output, but unless it is necessary in a decentral network? - Precisely it is not necessary for me. Yes, all so. But it is interesting to me, whether it is possible to arrange the latent is centralized-operated output in such decentral network. Whether the network creator as if a spider in a cryptography web, implicitly to control probabilities of output of the information can? So for example, some latent parameter - "rating" of the user from the point of view of the network creator can be entered. To it (creator) absolutely not mandatory to assign a rating to all participants (them can be billions), it can simply assign a rating to some casual participants, and these participants in turn can form a rating of other participants an indirect route  and , and so on. The formula should be such that in a network there was an automatic equalization and adjustment of this latent parameter. And at formation of output the priority would be had by sources with the highest rating. Well that is if at the person the unique friend news get to networks variants are not present - in output from this friend only. But if friends under one hundred output is formed already taking into account the latent rating. Thus the protocol should be such that output was formed  i.e. that the client could not change it changing the client code.