1

Topic: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

I here briefly described the memories http://rsdn.org/forum/life/7214558 the Author: xma Date: 05.08 18:55 and me here interested - there can be who or too that or remembers from antecedents?

2

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> and me here interested - there can be who or too that or remembers from antecedents? I do not remember anything. But voices tell.

3

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: xma>> and me here interested - there can be who or too that or remembers from antecedents? Ops> I do not remember anything. But voices tell. Really?

4

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> I here briefly described the memories xma> http://rsdn.org/forum/life/7214558 the Author: xma Date: 05.08 18:55 xma> and me here interested - there can be who or too that or remembers from antecedents? For what minuses  - do not trust in reincarnation?

5

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> it is real? Certainly. From the socket also speak.

6

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: xma>> it is real? Ops> it is finite. From the socket also speak. I do not stick in yours humour. At what here the socket?

7

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> and me here interested - there can be who or too that or remembers from antecedents? And how you were convinced that it not your imaginations?

8

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> I do not stick in yours humour. At what here the socket? So above privacy. At you not so?

9

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

xma>> it is real? Ops> it is finite. From the socket also speak. The socket simply open. On the one hand you, with another - THEY. At THEM there too the socket.

10

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Ops, you wrote: xma>> I do not stick in yours humour. At what here the socket? Ops> so above privacy. At you not so? You a liter floor that  ?

11

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> you a liter floor that  ? No, it it is not required to me. I and without them see life picturesque.

12

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: Antecedents are not present. Reincarnations are not present.

13

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

A> Antecedents are not present. Reincarnations are not present. , still tell god is not present.

14

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> for what minuses  - do not trust in reincarnation? You seriously consider, what at a forum of programmers will find trusting in reincarnation? Here times trusting in official Russian god two and , and in the Indian... No, we do not trust

15

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> I here briefly described the memories xma> http://rsdn.org/forum/life/7214558 the Author: xma Date: 05.08 18:55 xma> and me here interested - there can be who or too that or remembers from antecedents? I advise to try  breath. Flattens mighty well, it is possible to depart, but absolutely legally.

16

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

xma> and me here interested - there can be who or too that or remembers from antecedents? You will disappear. Reconcile. Then words,  over it by the sea of a thunderous rumble pathetically began to sound: - you are fitted badly by your coffin? Why not to try elastic coffins of firm of the Corpse of S.Kadavra? Their scientifically developed forms correspond to natural bends of a body and are enriched by vitamins. Use coffins of Kadavra - they are convenient. Remember... You... Will be... Are dead... Long... Long!.

17

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Muxa, you wrote: A>> Antecedents are not present. Reincarnations are not present. M> Ahaha, still tell god is not present. God is. And reincarnation is not present.

18

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, vsb, you wrote: vsb> You seriously consider, what at a forum of programmers will find trusting in reincarnation? Here times trusting in official Russian god two and , and in the Indian... Well, to find at a forum of programmers it is possible everybody. And in practice, a faith in reincarnation it all the same a step forward in comparison with official religions. For this faith does not imply necessity for execution of money for certain institutions that you prayed, and at the neighbor the cow died. And generally, , the thinking person who "trusts" in all these mystics, in practice does not trust, and hopes. Hopes that when he dies, it not the end, and there will be that that still. Hopes that in all that it does, there is what that sense. Hopes that if to arrive adequately in it is what that sense. Whatever cynic and the skeptic the person was outwardly, very many hope for miracles. For brains understand that chances almost zero. What mandatory to be the uttermost  that all was good. But despite it, hope that if to whom that to make good he not cynically betrays in the future if circumstances allow and for treachery will be nothing, and thanks. Though betrayed repeatedly, and all the same hopes, what not all such and to whom that it is possible to help. And here concerning a faith - personally I do not represent, as it is possible to trust in the presence of brains in what that. In the presence of brains that is possible that to know. And despite presence of brains that is possible on what to hope, let on illogical and too optimistical. But here it is real, a horse-radish I do not understand as it is possible to trust in the presence of brains in what  .

19

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> Hello, Muxa, you wrote: A>>> Antecedents are not present. Reincarnations are not present. M>> Ahaha, still tell god is not present. A> God is. And reincarnation is not present. E-e-e, and in what here logic?

20

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

21

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> Yes in what. Round and all. God is. There is also all. Calms, truth?

22

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Los Chtostrjaslos, you wrote: > calms, truth? Presence of God in itself cannot neither calm, nor afflict. It simply fact.

23

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> Presence of God in itself cannot neither calm, nor afflict. It simply fact. No, not the fact. Even proceeding from purely Christian concept of god - not the fact. You know why? Because God in this concept in all senses is infinite. As the absolute, as something truly universal. And the person is finite, and the human reason too is finite. That is, its informative abilities are restricted. Therefore the person never can learn that or about God. Any knowledge, assumptions, desires and conjectures will be only a shade, a projection of infinite on finite. Any such projection cannot reflect the validity. You certainly can object - God such wise and kind that specially generated for us simple and clear "projections", but look above is only your conjectures and assumptions. Yours, and also all adherents of all religions, sacred fathers and other interpreters. They too people. All without an exception - only people. Actually absolute knowledge at us is not present about what, even about our real physical world. But with it we learned to work practically. We have steady played back knowledge which allow us to receive practical useful results. To work with infinity practically we are not able and hardly we learn - besides on determination. Moreover: even if tomorrow God goes personally down on the Red Square, all the same any warranties neither at you, nor at somebody will not be. All for the same reason: the human brain is restricted and cannot, physically cannot, is correct perceive the infinite.

24

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A>> Presence of God in itself cannot neither calm, nor afflict. It simply fact. A> is not present, not the fact. Even proceeding from purely Christian concept of god - not the fact. A> you know why? Here is how time starting with  the concept everything that you wrote - ridiculously. As in Christianity God became the Person. And in  The human essence made such  possible for any person. Certainly, It  anybody and never. But we can infinitely come nearer to It through the Christ.

25

Re: Whether you that remember that of antecedents?

Hello, Amygdala, you wrote: A> Here is how times starting with  the concept everything that you wrote - ridiculously. As in Christianity God became the Person. And in  The human essence made such  possible for any person. More correctly, you so told. You of it did not see, and even if would see all  events personally - you would not have any possibility it to check up.