Hello, ija - , you wrote: > and whence 19 %? A normal reference you will not share? In your reference it is produced as an imperative. Whence to me to know whence these are taken of 19 %, but other links are not present. Simply it is similar to truth. V>> Intresno, and Konashenkovsky 23 of 25 it generally, is real at 19 %? > https://topwar.ru/123393-itogi-boevogo-
sirii.html > say lies yes? It is not known to me. For certain invent. > or you ? > > https://www.kp.ru/daily/26819/3856635/> On airdrome Djuvali 4 rockets were applied - all are forced down. > on airdrome Dumejr - 12 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Blej - 18 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Shajrat - 12 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Tifor - 2 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Mezze - 9 rockets, 5 are forced down. > on airdrome Homs - 16 rockets, 13 are forced down. > any airdrome has no serious corruptings. > - Thus on research and development objects around settlements Barze and Dzharamani, by our estimation, it is applied 30 rockets and controlled aerial bombs. From them 5 it has been destroyed Syrian by air defense means, - Konashenkov informed. > Everything, by estimations of the Minister of Defence, at shock reflection 112 antiaircraft guided missiles have been spent. From them: > "Armour" - it is let out 25, amazed 23 purposes. And here it already delirium of Konashenkova. Your right in it to trust, but common sense, material and logical arguments on the one hand, against words of any one person, despite of its post, personally to me a choice do not leave. Especially, if to take into consideration that the post at Konashenkova as time at all does not imply a holy duty to tell truth, and is faster even on the contrary. If you forgot, in the first day generally SANA did not speak about any Armour, other systems of air defense were specified. And after approximately days suddenly there was Konashenkov (what the hell bald it generally reported for Syrian, and is exceptional Syrian (!) complexes, after all our, protecting Hmejmim and Tartus, were not applied!) with armors which it included in the general offset already with 1st place. It is similar to banal advertizing lies. And besides... I Will repeat once again - there is no video from optical system of attending of the purpose of the Armour on which it would be visible as it forces down the Tomahawk. And they are simply obliged to be. And a secret are not.