1

Topic: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

https://www.gosnews.ru/news/armiya/za_t … protivnika And me spoke are my conjectures. 75 % vs 19 %. , and Konashenkovsky 23 from 25 it generally, it is real at 19 %? As I also suspected, most likely any Armours have not been involved at all in reflection of an April touch of Tomahawks. Beat on those objects where it was not stupid any protection. Also selected paths such that to any Armour not to get. In this connection once again it would be desirable to grin concerning naivety of some persons, any more I do not remember whom here who was perturbed that I do not trust briefings  the Russian Federation. An armor this banal garbage, the gone too far swindle on sale of a shit to Arabs.

2

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> https://www.gosnews.ru/news/armiya/za_t … protivnika V> And me spoke are my conjectures. V> 75 % vs 19 %. V> Intresno, and Konashenkovsky 23 of 25 it generally, is real at 19 %? V> As I also suspected, most likely any Armours have not been involved at all in reflection of an April touch of Tomahawks. V> beat on those objects where it was not stupid any protection. Also selected paths such that to any Armour not to get. V> in this connection once again it would be desirable to grin concerning naivety of some persons, any more I do not remember whom here who was perturbed that I do not trust briefings  the Russian Federation. The sir the Estonian? The report on limitation  of "Pantsir-S1" publication Date on April, 6th, 2012

3

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello, alexku, you wrote: A> the Sir the Estonian? A> the report on limitation  of "Pantsir-S1" publication Date on April, 6th, 2012 You are simple not in a subject. I watch all this fuss many years, the matter is that supporters of "Armour" (well as, supporters, they simply look a box and believed), on all criticism from as time of 2012, you tell that it was for a long time, and now it refined, upgraded, corrected, and in general now it tears all and all.

4

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> And me spoke are my conjectures. V> 75 % vs 19 %. And whence 19 %? A normal reference you will not share? In your reference it is produced as an imperative. V> Intresno, and Konashenkovsky 23 of 25 it generally, is real at 19 %? https://topwar.ru/123393-itogi-boevogo- … sirii.html  say lies yes? Or you  ? https://www.kp.ru/daily/26819/3856635/On airdrome Djuvali 4 rockets were applied - all are forced down. On airdrome Dumejr - 12 rockets, all are forced down. On airdrome Blej - 18 rockets, all are forced down. On airdrome Shajrat - 12 rockets, all are forced down. On airdrome Tifor - 2 rockets, all are forced down. On airdrome Mezze - 9 rockets, 5 are forced down. On airdrome Homs - 16 rockets, 13 are forced down. Any airdrome has no serious corruptings. - thus on research and development objects around settlements Barze and Dzharamani, by our estimation, it is applied 30 rockets and controlled aerial bombs. From them 5 it has been destroyed Syrian by air defense means, - Konashenkov informed. Everything, by estimations of the Minister of Defence, at shock reflection 112 antiaircraft guided missiles have been spent. From them: "Armour" - it is let out 25, amazed 23 purposes.

5

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: > and whence 19 %? A normal reference you will not share? In your reference it is produced as an imperative. Whence to me to know whence these are taken of 19 %, but other links are not present. Simply it is similar to truth. V>> Intresno, and Konashenkovsky 23 of 25 it generally, is real at 19 %? > https://topwar.ru/123393-itogi-boevogo- … sirii.html >  say lies yes? It is not known to me. For certain invent. > or you  ? > > https://www.kp.ru/daily/26819/3856635/> On airdrome Djuvali 4 rockets were applied - all are forced down. > on airdrome Dumejr - 12 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Blej - 18 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Shajrat - 12 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Tifor - 2 rockets, all are forced down. > on airdrome Mezze - 9 rockets, 5 are forced down. > on airdrome Homs - 16 rockets, 13 are forced down. > any airdrome has no serious corruptings. > - Thus on research and development objects around settlements Barze and Dzharamani, by our estimation, it is applied 30 rockets and controlled aerial bombs. From them 5 it has been destroyed Syrian by air defense means, - Konashenkov informed. > Everything, by estimations of the Minister of Defence, at shock reflection 112 antiaircraft guided missiles have been spent. From them: > "Armour" - it is let out 25, amazed 23 purposes. And here it already delirium of Konashenkova. Your right in it to trust, but common sense,  material  and  logical arguments on the one hand, against words of any one person, despite of its post, personally to me a choice do not leave. Especially, if to take into consideration that the post at Konashenkova as time at all does not imply a holy duty to tell truth, and is faster even on the contrary. If you forgot, in the first day generally SANA did not speak about any Armour, other systems of air defense were specified. And after approximately days suddenly there was Konashenkov (what the hell bald it generally reported for Syrian, and is exceptional Syrian (!) complexes, after all our, protecting Hmejmim and Tartus, were not applied!) with armors which it included in the general  offset already with 1st place. It is similar to banal advertizing lies. And besides... I Will repeat once again - there is no video from optical system of attending of the purpose of the Armour on which it would be visible as it forces down the Tomahawk. And they are simply obliged to be. And a secret are not.

6

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> Whence to me to know whence these are taken of 19 %, but other links are not present. V> it is simple similar on truth. Than similar on truth?? The facts nesbitija/sbitija result, time conceived a subject. I wait from you the bayesian approach or at least Neumann-Pirsona >> On airdrome Djuvali 4 rockets were applied - all are forced down. >> on airdrome Dumejr - 12 rockets, all are forced down. >> on airdrome Blej - 18 rockets, all are forced down. >> on airdrome Shajrat - 12 rockets, all are forced down. >> on airdrome Tifor - 2 rockets, all are forced down. >> on airdrome Mezze - 9 rockets, 5 are forced down. >> on airdrome Homs - 16 rockets, 13 are forced down. >> any airdrome has no serious corruptings. V> and here it already delirium of Konashenkova. Your right in it to trust, but common sense,  material  V> And besides... I Will repeat once again - there is no video from optical system of attending of the purpose of the Armour on which it would be visible as it forces down the Tomahawk. V> And they are simply obliged to be. And a secret are not. To whom are obliged? Verifications "from partners"?

7

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> https://www.gosnews.ru/news/armiya/za_t … protivnika V> And me spoke are my conjectures. V> 75 % vs 19 %. V> Intresno, and Konashenkovsky 23 of 25 it generally, is real at 19 %? Really.  recalled youth delivered WoW. So in  I send the ships and heroes (at such percent of success) - very often I win. When it understood, even ceased to investigate into them ))) one horse-radish changes nothing)) concerning Syria - can quite be. I remember on institute last years "Ray" worked in KB. There was there such project  "". Like it even it is accepted on arms now. In general went to fields to test. The field is pure. Autumn dank weather. This  is started up from a catapult starts to maneuver tudy-sjudy. But there was in that open country a lonely birch..... In general it is come from tests the sad. Asks the heads: - well as? - It is excellent, a birch forced down! Well and further, fell down all on Kazan  that they with  , and we not at affairs, approximately then I and passed in more highly paid office)

8

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello,    ija - , you wrote: > than similar on truth?? The facts nesbitija/sbitija result, time conceived a subject. I wait from you the bayesian approach or at least Neumann-Pirsona Eto similar on truth because about such result and it is necessary to expect taking into account tests for a polygon. And the facts... So you mention the facts , instead of , schedules and words of any Konashenkova. Then will be to speak about what. For some reason Jews easily showed video of defeat of the Armour. Because it is written by design by the rocket. And so in the Armour if , too by design it is written. But we showed nothing. It does not tell in itself about that that the Armour a shit, certainly. Can tell for example about that that it and did not use against Tomahawks because they through its zone of defeat did not fly by (in what I it is almost assured). But to say lies that what for that 23/25?

9

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

V> And the facts... So you mention the facts , instead of , schedules and words of any Konashenkova. 2008-08-08 Georgian armors are remembered were rather effective against our drying.

10

Re: [Torahs vs] Here that about what I told the Armour

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> It is similar to truth because about such result and it is necessary to expect taking into account tests for a polygon. A sign with tests for a polygon? Mention the facts! V> and the facts... So you mention the facts , instead of , schedules and words of any Konashenkova. I did not begin a subject.  to me to , you give for the market answer - give references. V> then will be to speak about what. It is exact. For now snivels you chew without any base on that. V> For some reason Jews easily showed video of defeat of the Armour. Because the Arabian calculation had a rest,  a unit of fire, instead of recharged and was on  it... It is not necessary to rub propagation V> It does not tell in itself about that that the Armour a shit, certainly. Can tell for example about that that it and did not use against Tomahawks because they through its zone of defeat did not fly by (in what I it is almost assured). V> But to say lies that what for that 23/25? There in the citation above - the amazed purposes. Where lies?