1

Topic: and Canada

it is finite and not the sample  and the sovereignty, but here visually show, as the sovereign state in reply to zoom-in from outside  should operate.

2

Re: and Canada

3

Re: and Canada

Hello, pagid, you wrote:> Saudity is finite and not the sample  and the sovereignty, but here visually show, as the sovereign state in reply to zoom-in from outside  should operate. P> From small . The USA they would not began so to answer. The USA, we note, into them and do not run, can be afraid. Well and it is natural, miracles do not happen, against the USA they if something happens do not pull.

4

Re: and Canada

> Saudity is finite and not the sample  and the sovereignty, but here visually show, as the sovereign state in reply to zoom-in from outside  should operate. P> From small . The USA they would not began so to answer. It not  abrupt, and Canada forgot the place. And it under a bench.

5

Re: and Canada

6

Re: and Canada

Hello, the Laid-back person, you wrote: P>> From small . The USA they would not began so to answer. The USA, we note, into them and do not run, we Learn history... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.17 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

7

Re: and Canada

When will bomb Saudi Arabia?

8

Re: and Canada

9

Re: and Canada

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> But to you any sovereignty is more important. From what... You drew such output?... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.17 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

10

Re: and Canada

Hello, Night Looking, you wrote: A>> But to you any sovereignty is more important. NANOSECOND> From what... You drew such output? "Zoom-in from outside ", "from small ", " for eggs", "Canada forgot the place"...

11

Re: and Canada

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> "Zoom-in from outside ", "from small ", " for eggs", "Canada forgot the place"... If the same Canada did not support propagation  the Saudi orders on earlier were secular the state - Iraq, Libya, Syria. So actively supports hypocritical .

12

Re: and Canada

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A>> "Zoom-in from outside ", "from small ", " for eggs", "Canada forgot the place"... P> If the same Canada did not support propagation  the Saudi orders on earlier were secular the state - Iraq, Libya, Syria. So actively supports hypocritical . Russia against propagation  the Saudi orders on earlier were secular the states (and I in it completely support it). But why Russia does not declare the position on protection of the rights of women in ? Too business and anything personal? And besides, any state not . There there are different forces. One support Wahhabites for the sake of the imperialistic interests, and others are engaged in legal assistance. Sometimes outwardly can look as that and another happens from "the person of the state", though actually there different sources.

13

Re: and Canada

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Russia against propagation  the Saudi orders on earlier were secular the states (and I in it completely support it). But why Russia does not declare the position on protection of the rights of women in ? Too business and anything personal? Attempts to learn others to live by the rules never in what good did not result. Recall though attempts to construct a socialism from the outside though to bring democracy.

14

Re: and Canada

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> Attempts to learn others to live by the rules never in what good did not result. Recall though attempts to construct a socialism from the outside though to bring democracy. And that less on constant attempts to teach each other to live also our civilization is under construction. For example, thanks to the USSR the Western world became much more socially . The USSR was not silent, paid attention to a distress of workers worldwide... And it in many respects defined development of the western countries by the way of the socially-oriented liberalism. And on the contrary - the countries Zadapa permanently paid attention to violations of human rights in the USSR, and eventually it led to a policy of publicity and liberalization (truth here the system did not withstand and failed - but it probably anybody to predict then could not, at all the West). And here this here ,  a position to be silent, not to interfere with affairs of the neighbor humiliating and beating the wife... Well I do not know. Anybody (except RussiaFellow) to bomb them does not offer, but it was necessary to tell. All planet, . Such announcements have certain influence on mass consciousness. But is not present, the sovereignty as the concept to you is more expensive. Because at the Russian Federation at most  in a gun on some questions. Therefore and the sovereignty, as the right to create everything in the boundaries, for many of you above than the fundamental rights and freedom of the person.

15

Re: and Canada

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> Therefore and the sovereignty, as the right to create everything in the boundaries, for many of you above than the fundamental rights and freedom of the person. By itself, this indisputable right. And the rights and freedom of the person are secondary and can argue.

16

Re: and Canada

17

Re: and Canada

Hello, Hobbes, you wrote: H> than the sovereign right to arrange fundamentalist BDSM-SALON? The orthodox

18

Re: and Canada

Hello, Hobbes, you wrote: H> I understand, if Canada drove economically then such answer would be logical and justified. But they simply made the protest against violation of human rights! And it not their business to make the protest on internal affairs of other countries. H> It turns out, what including according to colleagues at this forum, human rights are less important, than the sovereign right to arrange fundamentalist BDSM-SALON? No, the right of any people to live on the earth by the rules is more important to specify the rights of Anglo-Saxons to other people as it to live.

19

Re: and Canada

20

Re: and Canada

Hello, Cyberax, you wrote: from=main] show [/url] as the sovereign state in reply to zoom-in from outside  should operate. A C> do not worry, in Russia all will be fast as in Saudi Arabia. You wanted will tell "as in the USA", but confused all letters? A C> In sense, mandatory BDSM for all inhabitants in a type . Religion and criminal punishments for . Also will be as superrich ruling class and crowds of peasants deprived of civil rights. Whether , however,  under one textbooks of methodics that  about religious  with Hobbes the Author: Hobbes Date: 09.08 05:51? A C> And Canada does all correctly, as a result of Saudy will be wiped and money come to ask reversely for Canada to enclose. We look.

21

Re: and Canada

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A>>> But to you any sovereignty is more important. NANOSECOND>> From what... You drew such output? A> "zoom-in from outside ", "from small ", " for eggs", "Canada forgot the place"... And? From this that Canada operates as the street mugger in any way does not follow that to whom that is more important the sovereignty.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.17 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

22

Re: and Canada

Hello, the Laid-back person, you wrote: And it not their business to make the protest on internal affairs of other countries. No, the right of any people to live on the earth by the rules is more important to specify the rights of Anglo-Saxons to other people as it to live. There is no "a people right". Under this concept the right of elite, as a matter of fact - the right of the strongest to impose the power and the hierarchy all remaining disappears. But any hierarchy should be destroyed. There are only human rights, the rights of the Person. And if  laws of this, if one may say so, the countries, assume actual lawlessness of women and the death penalty for atheism weigh them  the code should be erased from the person of the Universe.

23

Re: and Canada

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: bu-bu-bu-bu-bu, everyone  . A> There are only human rights, the rights of the Person. It, as a matter of fact - is only right Anglo-Saxon elite to impose the power and the hierarchy to all remaining people.

24

Re: and Canada

Hello, the Laid-back person, you wrote: No, the right of any people to live on the earth by the rules is more important to specify the rights of Anglo-Saxons to other people as it to live. , by what rules? Those arrested legal experts, it their rules were? They agreed on these rules? It is assured that is not present.

25

Re: and Canada

Hello, the Laid-back person, you wrote: as the sovereign state in reply to zoom-in from outside  should operate. It appears, zoom-in from outside  has been expressed by a post in . Here it drove, a tin simply.