1

Topic: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/4372675.html

2

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, sharpman, you wrote: S> https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/4372675.html It is possible to start inquiry under forecasts of results of a referendum? I here think the majority will be for reform for all 3 offered statements are moronic. Can and is conscious to the point of irrationality to finish. Reform is certainly necessary, a question what.

3

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hardly admit a referendum. But if admit, will cool look as the aunt will throw the "correct" bulletins what him raised pension age for 8 years

4

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, Tee Moore, you wrote: TM> will cool look as the aunt will throw  is a good judge of perversions

5

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

S>  is a good judge of perversions Here where the present perversion: they Sound so: 1. "You for that the age installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation about provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 on reaching which there is a right to old-age pension assignment, did not change?". (From ) 2. Whether "you support, what installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation on provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 the age on which achievement there is a right to an old-age pension, cannot be increased?". (From public men) 3.: whether "you Agree what installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation on provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 the age which achievement grants the right to assignment of an insurance old-age pension (for men - 60 years, for women - 55 years), should not to raise?" . (From the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) It is the admitted questions on disagreement with increase a penny. Age. Whether a lot of the simple people understands where it is necessary to tick off? Yes? Or not?

6

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, sharpman, you wrote: S> https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/4372675.html 1. "You for that the age installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation about provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 on reaching which there is a right to old-age pension assignment, did not change?". (From ) 2. Whether "you support, what installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation on provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 the age on which achievement there is a right to an old-age pension, cannot be increased?". (From public men) 3.: whether "you Agree what installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation on provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 the age which achievement grants the right to assignment of an insurance old-age pension (for men - 60 years, for women - 55 years), should not to raise?". (From the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) 1. Well  it is clear that agents ." Did not change "it is necessary to replace on"did not raise". Against reduction of pension age I have nothing. 2. Here is is more specific. 3. Was even more specific. But what for three questions about same? As a result there should be any one?

7

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, anonymouse2, you wrote: A> But what for three questions about same? As a result there should be any one? It only three variants of a question from three initiative groups. In the same place, at the colonel, all is written.

8

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, kwd, you wrote: kwd> I here think the majority will be for reform for all 3 offered statements are moronic. Can and is conscious to the point of irrationality to finish. Yes like clear statements "age of a retirement not to raise, more I know nothing". I think the majority will be against because people normally do not want to miss "",  on any arguments of reason. kwd> reform is certainly necessary, a question what. Through a referendum reliably there transits only the such: 1. Age of a retirement not to raise (but it is possible to reduce)! 2. The size of pension to increase (it is possible strongly)! 3. Taxes not to raise (but it is possible to reduce)! 4. High inflation not to admit!

9

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

10

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, sharpman, you wrote: S> https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/4372675.html Ohrenet What degenerate them invented how much crazy and tangled first 2 statements? And what for? P.S. Approved a referendum most likely temporarily. Till September, 9th, then a shop contract. Thieves do not want to lose a rating on the eve of choices.

11

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> Thieves do not want to lose a rating on the eve of choices. Or generally spat and decided not to raise. The next 10 years on pension suffices, and in 6 years Putin with-companions leave also who then where their problem will search for money for pensions not.

12

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, kwd, you wrote: kwd> you hint Toest directly at that that in Russia the majority of these? Take above! On the earth!

13

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, copypaste, you wrote: Cs> Or generally spat and decided not to raise. The next 10 years on pension suffices, and in 6 years Putin with-companions leave also who then where their problem will search for money for pensions not. For this purpose what for to stir up a referendum?

14

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, sharpman, you wrote: S> https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/4372675.html And what further? A thought and the president should give OK?

15

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, TimurSPB, you wrote: TSP> And what further? A thought and the president should give OK? For referendum carrying out it can is necessary to collect signatures?

16

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, vl690001x, you wrote: V> For this purpose what for to stir up a referendum? What means to stir up? To hold a referendum, agree increase - it is lifted, do not agree - well and figs with you.

17

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, Tee Moore, you wrote: S>>  is a good judge of perversions TM> Here where the present perversion: TM> TM> they Sound so: TM> 1. "You for that the age installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation about provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 on reaching which there is a right to old-age pension assignment, did not change?". (From ) TM> 2. Whether "you support, what installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation on provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 the age on which achievement there is a right to an old-age pension, cannot be increased?". (From public men) TM> 3.: whether "you Agree what installed by the legislation of the Russian Federation on provision of pensions as of July, 1st, 2018 the age which achievement grants the right to assignment of an insurance old-age pension (for men - 60 years, for women - 55 years), should not to raise?" . (From the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) TM> It is the admitted questions on disagreement with increase a penny. Age. Whether a lot of the simple people understands where it is necessary to tick off? Yes? Or not? You not against pension age increase? 1. Yes, not against. 2. No, not against.

18

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Hello, TimurSPB, you wrote: S>> https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/4372675.html TSP> And what further? A thought and the president should give OK? It is necessary to register initiative groups in half of regions and to collect 2 million signatures.

19

Re: The Central Electoral Committee approved a referendum on pension reform

Cs>> Or generally spat and decided not to raise. The next 10 years on pension suffices, and in 6 years Putin with-companions leave also who then where their problem will search for money for pensions not. V> for this purpose what for to stir up a referendum? Because then they can collect nobody signatures.