1

Topic: about and

Julia Latynina conducts recently a video blog, it is interesting to me to look it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCyIS1TNU4k In this plot it was a question in the core about  (since a subject of murder of the Russian journalists). About journalists it is not so interesting to me (well there obviously that the driver was the accomplice of murder).  tells about  (it more likely the general term, speech not only about  Wagner). They now supervise there the local tsarka-president. It reminds that many important colonizations were led by the private companies: Cortes in America was faster the private initiative, Ermak at us, or colonization of Africa in 19 century. The private companies are quite often armed by more advanced weapon, than the state armies: For example, the most effective sea guns -  - have been accepted in the beginning by not state fleet (I suppose, pirates meant), and the vivid example - a machine gun Maxim has been rejected in the beginning the British army, but it was applied in Africa by the English private companies then already all European armies began to accept it on arms. The success of private colonizers can be reached by very small forces: so, Pissarro with 160 people won empire Inkov.  tells that in  now all is so dreadful that it at all fail-state, is the following stage when in a corpse hearts breed. Therefrom peacemakers of the United Nations already ran away, and their niche occupied .  mentions "a syndrome of 30-year-old war": when war lasts more than 30 years, the former farmers take the weapon and become robbers. The humanitarian help from the West only deprives this country of possibilities most to be selected from the dead state. For inhabitants  unique rescue - colonization (that the monopoly of one structure for violence was installed). Well that there is , but Latynina not so trusts in Russian colonization, but trusts in the Chinese colonization. I here with it do not agree, I consider that a possible place of China as the world leader - principal threat for the Earth as a whole. Interesting, at  in  there is an artillery?

2

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> They now supervise there the local tsarka-president. Whether truth that supervise? Really Frenchmen with the "" therefrom left? Then it is remarkable news. Here only it is trusted hardly. By the way, bodies of killed journalists took out through Paris.

3

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> In this plot it was a question in the core about  (since a subject of murder of the Russian journalists). About journalists it is not so interesting to me (well there obviously that the driver was the accomplice of murder). It is necessary to be obvious absolutely cranky that on creativity of this madwoman to judge about something. Children became a victim of the greed. Khodorkovsky gave them a heap of money. Personally with them there were 8.5 kilodollars. It was necessary to employ and not to go for a drive protection on them at night. And if ran, to give all and not to act heroically. And they, seemingly, decided to rescue property. The driver reasonably rescued a skin. It is guilty or not nobody knows. It its conjectures. Conjectures completely cranky and  the growing old silly woman.

4

Re: about and

K>> In this plot it was a question in the core about  (since a subject of murder of the Russian journalists). About journalists it is not so interesting to me (well there obviously that the driver was the accomplice of murder). VD> it is necessary to be obvious absolutely cranky that on creativity of this madwoman to judge about something. Vlad, you are ridiculous simply.

5

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: VD>> it is necessary to be obvious absolutely cranky that on creativity of this madwoman to judge about something. K> Vlad, you are ridiculous simply. With Vlad's quoted statement I completely agree.

6

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> Vlad, you are ridiculous simply. It is right, to perceive Latyninu as information source or opinions about the actual side of business is simply ridiculous. But its some thoughts which have been torn off from a reality, . As the illustration nobody extreme outlook. The main thing to understand that to a reality they relations have no.

7

Re: about and

8

Re: about and

VD> completely cranky chyo/shchyo write through "about". And that I long thought, what for and where the tick (check) has been delivered

9

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> Vlad, you are ridiculous simply. I already got used to it. People are made laugh very much  which with them not in a state to understand.  as over me laughed, when I spoke about Trampe and Grudinine. So laughed ... But exactly until then yet did not realize that I appeared the rights. So be sowed... While.

10

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> Vlad, you are ridiculous simply. Who would speak...

11

Re: about and

K> Julia Latynina conducts recently a video blog, it is interesting to me to look it: She not , but argues on rockets. She not the electronics engineer, but argues on oscillographs. This time it...? Not interesting

12

Re: about and

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> I already got used to it. People are made laugh very much  which with them not in a state to understand.  as over me laughed, when I spoke about Trampe and Grudinine. So laughed ... But exactly until then yet did not realize that I appeared the rights. So be sowed... While. So, once a year even a stick shoots

13

Re: about and

> chyo/shchyo write through "about".  a raven, pens , in  there was your fault

14

Re: about and

Hello, mjau, you wrote: M> so, once a year even the stick shoots This time not yours.

15

Re: about and

VD>> it is necessary to be obvious absolutely cranky that on creativity of this madwoman to judge about something. K> Vlad, you are ridiculous simply. I rarely agree with Vlad, but here on its side. Only it not the madwoman, and ------. To you a question - name the expression Latyninoj which has become national .

16

Re: about and

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: M>> so, once a year even the stick shoots A> This time not yours. You since morning did not attempt, what such spiteful?

17

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> Julia Latynina conducts recently a video blog, it is interesting to me to look it: Look, be protected arrows of an oscillograph!

18

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> Julia Latynina... K> For inhabitants  unique rescue - colonization of Khm... And she whence knows?

19

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: VD>> it is necessary to be obvious absolutely cranky that on creativity of this madwoman to judge about something. K> Vlad, you are ridiculous simply. Yes is not present, it just you ridiculous.

20

Re: about and

Hello, Victor Ivanidze, you wrote: VI> Only it not the madwoman, and ------. So it also is .

21

Re: about and

22

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> Julia Latynina conducts recently a video blog, it is interesting to me to look it: It it is interesting to look only at whom generally brains are not present - there delirium in every second sentence

23

Re: about and

Hello, Khimik, you wrote: K> Julia Latynina conducts recently a video blog, it is interesting to me to look it: I Remember, how it rubbed that the Russian tanks shot Tshinval, being inside and, obviously, shooting at the sky that shells fell on a city. Perhaps, I will subscribe on its comic .

24

Re: about and

VD>>> it is necessary to be obvious absolutely cranky that on creativity of this madwoman to judge about something. 0> with Vlad's quoted statement I completely agree. But all the same this Latynina not so is abrupt, as was abrupt in the serial madness New Dvorsky.

25

Re: about and

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> it is necessary to be obvious absolutely cranky that on creativity of this madwoman to judge about something. Did not read, but you condemn? Give you you will look at a roller, and then it will be possible to consider that that there is told in detail.