1

Topic: Decades of bright victories - 2

2

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

3

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello,/aka/, you wrote: A> Title, naturally, false. It is punished, as it is specified in the text, for violation of the order of the organization of public procession of "walk of the free people", and the photo was one of proofs. If people simply walk along the street, or stand, without posters and appeals to something is "public procession"?

4

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> If people simply walk along the street, or stand, without posters and appeals to something is "public procession"? Then that is not present, not simply. PS they did not know, what the photo near a monument paid and costs 20 thousand roubles?

5

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: ARK>> If people simply walk along the street, or stand, without posters and appeals to something is "public procession"? Vi2> Then that is not present, not simply. What though it "quits"? From back of the Russian "judicial" system?

6

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> If people simply walk along the street, or stand, without posters and appeals to something is "public procession"? Dura lex sed lex: 1) public action - opened, peace, accessible to everyone, held in the form of meeting, meeting, demonstration, procession or picketing or in various combinations of these forms the action which is carried out at the initiative of citizens of the Russian Federation, political parties, other public join and religious join, including with usage of vehicles. The purpose of public action is the free expression and formation of judgements, promotion of requirements on various questions of political, economic, social both cultural life of the country and questions of foreign policy or informing of voters on the activity at a meeting of the deputy of legislative (representative) public authority, the deputy of a representative body of municipal union with voters; 2) meeting - joint presence of citizens at place specially led out or adjusted for it for collective arguing of any socially significant questions; 3) meeting - mass presence of citizens at a certain place for public expression of public opinion concerning actual problems of preferentially political character; 4) demonstration - the organized public expression of public moods by group of citizens with usage during movement, including on vehicles, posters, headers and other means of evident propaganda; 5) procession - mass passage of citizens on in advance certain route with a view of attention engaging to any problems; the Meeting and procession do without posters and appeals.

7

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello,/aka/, you wrote: A> 5) procession - mass passage of citizens on in advance certain route with a view of attention engaging to any problems; Three persons at a monument is a mass passage of citizens on in advance certain route with a view of attention engaging to any problems? What for BRAD?

8

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

ARK> If people simply walk along the street, or stand, without posters and appeals to something is "public procession"? And if with flags? That photo

9

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> Three persons at a monument is a mass passage of citizens on in advance certain route with a view of attention engaging to any problems? What for BRAD? I admire ability of the Russian oppositionist in one short subject so was multifaced to be shown! At first certainly false title. Then an insult of judicial system that it honesty performed the operation and precisely executed the law. And at last direct lie about "three persons".

10

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> what though it "quits"? From back of the Russian "judicial" system? There is such concept the transaction of cover or "the Feigned transaction, that is the transaction which is made to cover on purpose other transaction, is insignificant. To the transaction which the sides really meant, taking into account a transaction being, rules concerning it are applied." It is visible, the court saw wood behind trees.

11

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello,/aka/, you wrote: ARK>> Three persons at a monument is a mass passage of citizens on in advance certain route with a view of attention engaging to any problems? What for BRAD? A> I Admire ability of the Russian oppositionist in one short subject so was multifaced to be shown! I am surprised inability of the Russian patriot in one short subject to do the elementary logical outputs. A> certainly false title. 1) Lies. 2) questions concerning title - to .. A> honesty performed the operation and precisely executed the law Stupid lies. A> and at last direct lie about "three persons" Yes, precisely, not three persons, and two. Sorry, already seven. How it is possible to consider a photo of two seven persons as the procession proof? Or, can, in business materials there are photos of the MASS congestion of citizens (and also the proof of what it was "passage on in advance certain route with a view of attention engaging to any problems")? And you are simple about it held back? Share, it is interesting to me.

12

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> There is such concept the transaction of cover or "the Feigned transaction, that is the transaction which is made to cover on purpose other transaction, is insignificant. To the transaction which the sides really meant, taking into account a transaction being, rules concerning it are applied." It is visible, the court saw wood behind trees. Probably. It is a pity only that it very selectively does it.

13

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, hlt, you wrote: ARK>> If people simply walk along the street, or stand, without posters and appeals to something is "public procession"? hlt> And if with flags? Well, if on common sense, on any public action it does not pull. And if to the formal sign it is possible to close a heap of people. Selectivity of laws in all beauty.

14

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> it is possible. It is a pity only that it very selectively does it. I see, you at all do not understand about what speak. To court gave proofs, he counted their irrefutable and sufficient. Therefore, who selectively does, so it is employees of Centre, instead of court, but at them operation such selectively to do, instead of without grounds and in a crowd.

15

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> I see, you at all do not understand about what speak. To court gave proofs, he counted their irrefutable and sufficient. Therefore, who selectively does, so it is employees of Centre, instead of court, but at them operation such selectively to do, instead of without grounds and in a crowd. The court selectively counted any  employees of Centre as irrefutable and sufficient proofs. So it is clear?

16

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> the Court selectively counted any  employees of Centre as irrefutable and sufficient proofs. So it is clear? As he selectively counted, if the court is not engaged in it. The court cannot select business and even them to initiate, and should work as that enters to it under the law. The proofs given to court, suited all sides, quits that and was. Here and all history. Judging by your words, you are negative to it, and to system, concern, but have the right, only it is not necessary to represent it as true that these people did not make that, for what punished them.

17

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> As he selectively counted, if the court is not engaged in it. The court cannot select business and even them to initiate, and should work as that enters to it under the law. Selectively to judge, it is not necessary to select affairs or to initiate them. Vi2> the proofs given to court, suited all sides, quits that and was. !!! It after all a joke, truth? I do not believe that it it is possible to tell seriously. Vi2> Here and all history. The corrupted court gave on a cap objectionable the authorities to the person. A typical situation in this country. Here and all history. Vi2> it is not necessary to represent it as true that these people did not make that, for what punished them. I did not hold a candle. An output that "people did not make that, for what punished them", I do only of that information that at me is. And meanwhile any distinct not that that refutations, but even reasons - I did not hear.

18

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> Yes, precisely, not three persons, and two. Sorry, already seven. How it is possible to consider a photo of two seven persons as the procession proof? You recognize that business is based on a unique picture. Any witnesses, any other documentary acknowledgement. But here already showed that all was not absolutely how you represented it to yourself.

19

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A> But here already showed that all was not absolutely how you represented it to yourself. Here "showed" only it: It is punished, as it is specified in the text, for violation of the order of the organization of public procession of "walk of the free people", and the photo was one of proofs. The photo of several persons at a monument as the procession proof is something behind an edge of the formal logic. If at  the given post there is a description of other proofs (same "one of"), would be interesting to look at it. Suddenly these other proofs actually prove something, unlike the first.

20

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: A>> But here already showed that all was not absolutely how you represented it to yourself. ARK> here "showed" only it: Not only, two seven you already forgot? ARK> the photo of several persons at a monument as the procession proof is something behind an edge of the formal logic. If at  the given post there is a description of other proofs (same "one of"), would be interesting to look at it. Suddenly these other proofs actually prove something, unlike the first. You see you should prove it, as remaining proofs are insignificant, after all you state it. But you simply repeat that the decision has been carried out on the basis of one picture.

21

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A> Not only, two seven you already forgot? Yes, about it forgot. But this circumstance is insignificant also changes nothing. A> you see you should prove it, as remaining proofs are insignificant, after all you state it. But you simply repeat that the decision has been carried out on the basis of one picture. I already wrote here about it. I know only that is specified in news. The citizen claims what has more information? Perfectly, so let shares it, we consider. Probably that news lies - quite it I admit, and I recognize, if the refutation is resulted. But meanwhile, besides  cheeks and announcements "all is made under the law", - anything.

22

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

23

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> selectively to judge, it is not necessary to select affairs or to initiate them. Who selects affairs or initiates them? Central district court of Tolyatti? Like would be not present. Employees of Centre on struggle against extremism? And it not the court, is the normal citizens, authorized to struggle with extremism. Here they also struggle, and is legally correct and competent. So, native, all under the law. You do not trust? Well you believe that these figures were not engaged in public action. And here should check. ARK> !!! !!! ARK> the Corrupted court gave on a cap objectionable the authorities to the person. A typical situation in this country. Here and all history. The normal court managed to calm extreme oppositionists. The atypical situation, but it is corrected. ARK> I did not hold a candle. An output that "people did not make that, for what punished them", I do only of that information that at me is. And meanwhile any distinct not that that refutations, but even reasons - I did not hear. And you their itself should find. Give at least we wait judgements which Erkaev should lay out in a network. There and all will be written that as well as why. Meanwhile there is this certain judgement, let and unpublished on which incident takes place to be.

24

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> In the Saratov region there was a failure to involvement Lada Kalina and BMW X5 in which the prior of the Sampsonievsky cathedral in St.-Petersburg archimandrite Serafim went. ARK> the Cleric was in BMW salon, but at the wheel there was other person who did not manage to drive. The crossover took off on a counter band, faced with Lada Kalina. Sitting in Lada the passenger As a result perished, the driver of this car is hospitalized with traumas. Also what here not so? Well, road accident. If the roof does not go, like as anything reprehensible in the given news to find difficultly. It is possible explanations?

25

Re: Decades of bright victories - 2

Hello, VladD2, you wrote: VD> Also what here not so? Well, road accident. If the roof does not go, like as anything reprehensible in the given news to find difficultly. It is possible explanations? Yes somehow not so on-bozheski it - to go with the personal driver by the magnificent machine. The Christ after all expelled shopkeepers from a temple, so after all? Well, and about that this  left on  and pair  knocked down, I and do not speak - the sacred person, it is possible for it.