1

Topic: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Pay 4 % and sleep easily.  I was defined with the size of the rate for self-occupied https://news.mail.ru/economics/34319926/pensions so I understand at self-occupied will not be on reaching 63/65? Only 68/70?

2

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> Pay 4 % and sleep easily.  it was defined with the size of the rate for self-occupied xma> https://news.mail.ru/economics/34319926/And what  promises in changeovers?

3

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> Pay 4 % and sleep easily.  it was defined with the size of the rate for self-occupied xma> https://news.mail.ru/economics/34319926/Well and how differently? Here either you deduct , or you have restrictions at which society takes you on the content (consider that those who   share), or itself - you all possibilities are opened:  taxes and private funds at your instruction. I understand that you like to be in roles of house cattle, but this your individual property.

4

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> Pay 4 % and sleep easily.  I was defined with the size of the rate for self-occupied xma> https://news.mail.ru/economics/34319926/xma> pensions so I understand at self-occupied will not be on reaching 63/65? Only 68/70? And it generally powers  to solve it or not?

5

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: xma>> https://news.mail.ru/economics/34319926/_> Also what  promises in changeovers? And what it should in exchange? The tax very small, indecently small.

6

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: xma>> I so understand pensions at self-occupied will not be on reaching 63/65? Only 68/70? S> And it generally powers  to solve it or not? Is not present certainly.

7

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: xma>>> https://news.mail.ru/economics/34319926/_>> Also what  promises in changeovers? N> and what it should in exchange? The tax very small, indecently small. If you pay for something you should receive something in changeovers.

8

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> I so understand pensions at self-occupied will not be on reaching 63/65? Only 68/70? Yes. The same  pay payments in ., for this reason can claim not for social pension. Look is better, the state considers what types of activity getting under "self-employment". This rendering of services of quotients to persons private persons - tutoring, nurses,  in premises. All life earning on life it is difficult to to present the person to these, it is normal  for students, the pensioners occasionally working, but is normal too  combined with operation on . But news marasmic - the mad printer grows in desire  each step of the person. No necessity for state regulation of these relations existed.

9

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> look Is better, the state considers what types of activity getting under "self-employment". This rendering of services of quotients to persons private persons - tutoring, nurses,  in premises. By the way, it means what actually simply to ask someone to help someone for money it appears semilegal business.

10

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, Michael7, you wrote: M> By the way, it means what actually simply to ask someone to help someone for money it appears semilegal business. To ask business absolutely lawful. But if for rendering services not the single income, such activity it conducts it purposefully it turns out that he should pay this tax.

11

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, Michael7, you wrote: M> By the way, it means what actually simply to ask someone to help someone for money it appears semilegal business. Why? You does not concern, whether your "assistant" pays taxes, you cannot bear responsibility for its actions.

12

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> If you pay for something you should receive something in changeovers. Living in the state it is necessary to pay taxes. And around "in exchange" it is possible to wind so much  demagogy what to consider it senselessly. Since banal - "I do not want to pay existence of law enforcement bodies - at me the knife is", "I do not want to pay building and repair of roads - at me the car is not present"

13

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> Also what  promises in changeovers? Not to make answerable for tax non-payment. The tax absolutely idiotic, but idea to demand something in exchange is not cleverer.

14

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: N>> And what it should in exchange? The tax very small, indecently small. _> if you pay for something you should receive something in changeovers. The right to life - is enough?

15

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> the Tax absolutely idiotic, but the idea to demand something in exchange is not cleverer.  please what for the state generally has been created? Or you think that magnification of financing of people, not able to control, leads to the positive results?

16

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, pagid, you wrote: _>> If you pay for something you should receive something in changeovers. P> living in the state it is necessary to pay taxes. And around "in exchange" it is possible to wind so much  demagogy what to consider it senselessly. Well is not present, we will consider. From what it I would give someone money and is fine that demanded nothing in exchange, but even it is necessary to consider? How about you give all money of the management company, or , or to the Village Soviet (looking where do you live)? And what for, it is impossible to consider. Well is not present so business does not go.

17

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> Well is not present, we will consider. From what it I would give someone money and is fine that demanded nothing in exchange, but even it is necessary to consider? How about you give all money of the management company, or , or to the Village Soviet (looking where do you live)? And what for, it is impossible to consider. Well is not present so business does not go. So budgets federal, regional and local are accessible to acquaintance. Simply demagogy normally comes in shape "and it" it is not necessary to me. And yes, the state not shop and not a management company and not .

18

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> Raskazhite please what for generally has been created the state? _> or you think that magnification of financing of people, not able to control, leads to the positive results? The state budgets of all levels are accessible. Yes their content disagreement, but system of relations between the state and the citizen in  to the form - " to me here can cause that slice, and bread it is not necessary for me, I the European and bread do not eat" it does not turn out.

19

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

P> the State budgets of all levels are accessible. Yes their content disagreement, but system of relations between the state and the citizen in  to the form - " to me here can cause that slice, and bread it is not necessary for me, I the European and bread do not eat" it does not turn out. All is correct. Voted for Putin and EdRo - . Bon appetit!

20

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: P>> the Tax absolutely idiotic, but the idea to demand something in exchange is not cleverer. _> Raskazhite please what for generally has been created the state? _> or you think that magnification of financing of people, not able to control, leads to the positive results? Is not present here more pertinently to ask, what it so already money in budgets does not suffice, what was accepted for ? Yes 4 % of arrivals from them - same the copecks, normally self-occupied it are simple any additional left , great sums there never was. Well exceptions probably always it is possible to find, but in general is literally a maximum of thousand 20-40 in a month for the majority, and it is sharply irregular.

21

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, pagid, you wrote: _>> If you pay for something you should receive something in changeovers. P> living in the state it is necessary to pay taxes. And around "in exchange" it is possible to wind so much  demagogy what to consider it senselessly. Since banal - "I do not want to pay existence of law enforcement bodies - at me the knife is", "I do not want to pay building and repair of roads - at me the car is not present" In an adjacent subject about rent of apartments I gave an example as to make payment of the tax by useful to the transaction sides, but it was not pleasant to you.

22

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> Pay 4 % and sleep easily.  the second attempt from a shade was defined with the size of the rate for self-occupied It already to deduce people. But while there is here this the Author: VladD2 Date: 28.07 21:55zhadno-nonsense anybody will not pay. xma> https://news.mail.ru/economics/34319926/the Source . An absolute dustbin. xma> I so understand pensions at self-occupied will not be on reaching 63/65? Only 68/70? And  something generally someone should them? They on all  wanted, and to it also to pay?

23

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, kov_serg, you wrote: _> Raskazhite please what for generally has been created the state? Read Lenin: the State is there is a machine for maintenance of domination of one class over others. By the way, at it obvious, concerning the purposes of taxes: to Live in a society and to be free from a society it is impossible.

24

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, xma, you wrote: xma> I so understand pensions at self-occupied will not be on reaching 63/65? Only 68/70? What you for the person? Itself  the information, but it you do not read. Here it under your link is written by huge letters: As the head of Ministry of economic development and trade Maxim Oreshkin declared earlier, the state provides self-occupied only minimum social pension. For help, at us pension and so at plinth level so speech will go most likely about a difference to 1-3 thousand.

25

Re: Pay 4 % and sleep easily. But without pension.

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> So budgets federal, regional and local are accessible to acquaintance. Simply demagogy normally comes in shape "and it" it is not necessary to me. P> And yes, the state not shop and not a management company and not . All of them take money for services or for promises of services. All of them sometimes change, with the big or smaller involvement of those who pays money. In what a difference?