1

Topic: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

2

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

3

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, 0x7be, you wrote: So did not quit (-) By the way, in taken countries some separately import  is legislatively forbidden. It turns out, knowingly.

4

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> By the way, in taken countries some separately import  is legislatively forbidden. It turns out, knowingly. And sense? The malefactor will not use legally imported device for a crime.

5

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

6

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, marcopolo, you wrote: M> And sense? The malefactor will not use legally imported device for a crime. And goodness knows?

7

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> * with * I Guess, what.

8

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> And goodness knows? Malefactors can use radio-controlled  against a presidential tuple. Let's forbid import  and radio components.

9

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, rookie, you wrote: R> Malefactors can use radio-controlled  against a presidential tuple. Let's forbid import  and radio components. Let's forbid tuples and malefactors!

10

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

I do not understand, what for it were , instead of planes or it is even better (in sense flying faster) - rockets. Problems to make the rocket on " fuel" it is not visible. And though from a paper it is possible to wind the case. If they got explosive 4 (by the way, what is it?) I think, as with the rocket would consult. By the way, not clearly, as these  forced down: falling on charge C-4 of a load in mass of 41 kg from distance of 91 sm and a direct hit  bullets from reasonably short distance do not lead to explosion

11

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: > I do not understand, what for it were , instead of planes And from what you took that it were not planes? > by the way, not clearly as these  forced down: > falling on charge C-4 of a load in mass of 41 kg from distance of 91 sm and a direct hit  bullets from reasonably short distance do not lead to explosion There there is such piece as a detonator, and so it where is more sensitive.... <<RSDN@Home 1.3.17 alpha 5 rev. 62>>

12

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

13

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: So the matter is that if such attempt made on  a companion cries and snivels would be unlike more. Well as - terrorists!  them! To find and punish publicly.

14

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: Vi2> So the matter is that if such attempt made on  a companion cries and snivels would be unlike more. Well as - terrorists!  them! To find and punish publicly. Rukopozhatnye companions, type of Trama, Putin, or Si Dzyn Pinja, control something significant. And Maduro... Well Maduro and Maduro. A difference not in , and in significance.

15

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> Rukopozhatnye companions, type of Trama, Putin, or Si Dzyn Pinja, control something significant. And Maduro... Well Maduro and Maduro. A difference not in , and in significance. Business not these persons, and in terrorists, probably, even international since there is an information that they from Colombia. And the relation to them: there are terrorists against freedom and there are fighters for freedom.

16

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Vi2, you wrote: S>> Rukopozhatnye companions, type of Trama, Putin, or Si Dzyn Pinja, control something significant. And Maduro... Well Maduro and Maduro. A difference not in , and in significance. Vi2> business not these persons, and in terrorists, probably, even international since there is an information that they from Colombia. And the relation to them: there are terrorists against freedom and there are fighters for freedom. Yes is not present, business in persons, and in terrorists, and in what, in this case. In Somalii any generally terrorists kill other terrorists, and all  on these processes from a high belltower. And if now terrorists from Colombia go and interrupt all population of Somalia, whether it will deserve news? No. Who will understand there, good they, bad, for freedom, against freedom? And Venezuela. Shithol it also is Shithol that with them to take. Basically, it is impossible to eliminate that there already every tenth died with hunger, and we even not in course.

17

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

NANOSECONDS> And from what you took that it were not planes? I looked at blasting video, the device, and it not the plane (it seems that six screws) there is visible: the NANOSECOND> There is such piece as a detonator, and so it where is more sensitive. However probability of hit in a detonator more low. At all limitation of rockets, it is true  technology. They can be created almost in bronze age Cruise missiles are designed to deliver a large warhead over long distances with high precision.

18

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

19

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

20

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: > I do not understand, what for it were , instead of planes or it is even better (in sense flying faster) - rockets. > Problems to make the rocket on " fuel" it is not visible. You joke? To "force" the self-made rocket to fly where it is necessary much more difficult, than to buy  with ready management system.

21

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

Hello, Sharowarsheg, you wrote: S> Yes is not present, business in persons, and in terrorists, and in what, in this case. In Somalii any generally terrorists kill other terrorists, and all  on these processes from a high belltower. And if now terrorists from Colombia go and interrupt all population of Somalia, whether it will deserve news? No. Who will understand there, good they, bad, for freedom, against freedom? And Venezuela. Shithol it also is Shithol that with them to take. Basically, it is impossible to eliminate that there already every tenth died with hunger, and we even not in course. So in that also put that us it is impossible, and we - can. Here it here Shithol in all beauty. And Venezuela is the country of Venezuelans, and  with the charter there there is nothing.

22

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

23

Re: And what it nobody considers attempt at Maduro?

P> you Joke? To "force" the self-made rocket to fly where it is necessary much more difficult Than it? Both here and there - the computer system is necessary. Both here and there it is necessary control of working organs. There is a small difference that the rocket should be completely independent, and  it is possible to control visually. (But just this difference also allowed  to force down). P> than to buy  with ready management system. There are no brains - mission is ruined. If  it was independent as the rocket, it too would fly on the purpose faster (from height would fall at an angle).