1

Topic: Here what for court

2

Re: Here what for court

Hello, rookie, you wrote: R> R> Also in Roskomnadzore noted that the owner of a site himself should contact a hoster and learn, how it is possible to achieve an unblocking. Hoster DigitalOcean refused to cooperate with department, representatives of Roskomnadzora told. Well I and spoke. At the owner of a site contractual relations with a hoster, to it and the claim, and that already let itself with  understands, though in court, though as. It is strange that the claim with the wrong responder generally accepted.

3

Re: Here what for court

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> Well I and spoke. At the owner of a site contractual relations with a hoster, to it and the claim, and that already let itself with  understands, though in court, though as. It is strange that the claim with the wrong responder generally accepted. The representative of the State Office of Public Prosecutor noted that department does not write separate requests about each site as it is tiresome.

4

Re: Here what for court

Hello, Ops, you wrote: R>> R>> Also in Roskomnadzore noted that the owner of a site himself should contact a hoster and learn, how it is possible to achieve an unblocking. Hoster DigitalOcean refused to cooperate with department, representatives of Roskomnadzora told. Ops> Well I and spoke. At the owner of a site contractual relations with a hoster, to it and the claim, and that already let itself with  understands, though in court, though as. It is strange that the claim with the wrong responder generally accepted. And the contract with a hoster, for certain, specifies that a hoster: 1. Gives computing resources for a site 2. Anchors this site to defined IP to the address or one of some range. All points are fulfilled, and that that IP the address is inaccessible in any separate country or, for example, within the limits of any office, or apartment, explicitly are not problems of a hoster and requirements of the contract with it do not become covered. For example, if any Internet provider, for example MTS or the Body-2342, or the Nizhnezaperdonsk-TV set, under own initiative blocks a site chtototam.ru, it is necessary to understand with the provider, instead of with a hoster. The hoster reasonably specifies that it quite fulfills the contract. It can undertake any efforts for the sake of the clients, but is not obliged.

5

Re: Here what for court

Hello, fmiracle, you wrote: F> All points are fulfilled, and that that IP the address is inaccessible in any separate country or, for example, within the limits of any office, or apartment, explicitly are not problems of a hoster and requirements of the contract with it do not become covered. And who is guilty, what the owner of a site agreed with these conditions? F> for example if any Internet provider, for example MTS or the Body-2342, or the Nizhnezaperdonsk-TV set, under own initiative blocks a site chtototam.ru, it is necessary to understand with the provider, instead of with a hoster. The hoster reasonably specifies that it quite fulfills the contract. It can undertake any efforts for the sake of the clients, but is not obliged. Or it is possible to go to that hoster with whom do not lock because of it .

6

Re: Here what for court

Hello, fmiracle, you wrote: F> For example if any Internet provider, for example MTS or the Body-2342, or the Nizhnezaperdonsk-TV set, under own initiative blocks a site chtototam.ru, it is necessary to understand with the provider, instead of with a hoster. The hoster reasonably specifies that it quite fulfills the contract. It can undertake any efforts for the sake of the clients, but is not obliged. It is logical. If at me the neighbor delivers  off-the-air TV - to me on on it to bring an action or against a television center?

7

Re: Here what for court

Hello, Ops, you wrote: F>> All points are fulfilled, and that that IP the address is inaccessible in any separate country or, for example, within the limits of any office, or apartment, explicitly are not problems of a hoster and requirements of the contract with it do not become covered. Ops> and who is guilty, what the owner of a site agreed with these conditions? So others also are not present. No hoster to you can guarantee that the provider of the client does not block to it access to your site. It approximately how to demand from the seller of the car that in the machine sold by it anybody never .

8

Re: Here what for court

Hello, fmiracle, you wrote: F> So others also are not present. No hoster to you can guarantee that the provider of the client does not block to it access to your site. It approximately how to demand from the seller of the car that in the machine sold by it anybody never . So in this case lock because of omission by a hoster of laws. To find concordant to fulfill laws of the Russian Federation it is possible.

9

Re: Here what for court

Hello, rookie, you wrote: It not court, this court. In this country or not, or it is not enough courts.

10

Re: Here what for court

Hello, Ops, you wrote: Ops> So in this case lock because of omission by a hoster of laws. It is what? The link to the law you will give?

11

Re: Here what for court

Hello, AlexRK, you wrote: ARK> Hello, rookie, you wrote: ARK> It not court, this court. In this country or not, or it is not enough courts.

12

Re: Here what for court

Hello, rookie, you wrote: R> It is what? The link to the law you will give? https://rg.ru/2017/07/30/fz276-site-dok.html

13

Re: Here what for court

Hello, Ops, you wrote: R>> It is what? The link to the law you will give? Ops> https://rg.ru/2017/07/30/fz276-site-dok.html 17. Positions of present article are not spread to operators of the state information systems, state structures and local governments, and also on cases of usage of hardware-software accessors to information resources, information-telecommunication networks access to which is restricted provided that the circle of users of such hardware-software means their owners is in advance defined also usage of such hardware-software means is carried out in the technological purposes of support of activity of the person who are carrying out their usage. ". Ha-ha. That is if a hoster  CIA it cannot be locked. It state Weigh the law  a word"Russian", and in 17 point missed.

14

Re: Here what for court

Hello, rookie, you wrote: R> That is if a hoster  CIA it cannot be locked. It state R> Weigh the law  a word "Russian", and in 17 point missed. With the judge on this subject , then you will tell, the lawyer.