Hello. I try to become the blogger, I write different articles. Whether I would like to show here my article "there Can be a good psychologist ' the shoemaker without boots '".
Though article it is faster a dial-up "than reasonings on a subject" in which arguments both pro, and contra are resulted, as a whole I support the point of view that the psychologist with own psychological problems can be quite successful in operation.
On the one hand, the psychologist having own problems, as a rule has also any experience of struggle against these problems, at least partial, and it can impart experience it with the patient. Probably, validly and such reasoning: the more at the psychologist of problems, the more actively he searches for different methods of the decision of these problems, and accordingly accumulates experience.
It is necessary to mark also that problems happen different - difficultly solved and what to solve rather easily. It is possible to lead such analogy: the ugly woman can more than beautiful, to give a good advice to other women, how to win the man: as it cannot win the man beauty, it should develop for this purpose at herself other useful qualities, for example ability to listen and understanding of psychology.
On the other hand, here pertinently to result George Bernard Shaw phrase "Who is able - does, who is not able - learns". This phrase has still an addition: "who is not able to learn - supervises". Speech that in psychologists and "guru" quite often there are not self-sufficient people to whom this activity is necessary for self-affirmation.
Problems at the psychologist can strongly hinder effective operation if they are not realized for the psychologist. An example: if the psychologist-man has a sexual inconsistency, he does not guess that something similar is also its patient, as realization of such problem unpleasantly for it.