1

Topic:

Hello. I try to become the blogger, I write different articles. Whether I would like to show here my article "there Can be a good psychologist ' the shoemaker without boots '".
https://grandrienko.com/sapozhnik.html
Summary:
Though article it is faster a dial-up "than reasonings on a subject" in which arguments both pro, and contra are resulted, as a whole I support the point of view that the psychologist with own psychological problems can be quite successful in operation.
On the one hand, the psychologist having own problems, as a rule has also any experience of struggle against these problems, at least partial, and it can impart experience it with the patient. Probably, validly and such reasoning: the more at the psychologist of problems, the more actively he searches for different methods of the decision of these problems, and accordingly accumulates  experience.
It is necessary to mark also that problems happen different - difficultly solved and what to solve rather easily. It is possible to lead such analogy: the ugly woman can more than beautiful, to give a good advice to other women, how to win the man: as it cannot win the man beauty, it should develop for this purpose at herself other useful qualities, for example ability to listen and understanding of psychology.
On the other hand, here pertinently to result George Bernard Shaw phrase "Who is able - does, who is not able - learns". This phrase has still an addition: "who is not able to learn - supervises". Speech that in psychologists and "guru" quite often there are not self-sufficient people to whom this activity is necessary for self-affirmation.
Problems at the psychologist can strongly hinder effective operation if they are not realized for the psychologist. An example: if the psychologist-man has a sexual inconsistency, he does not guess that something similar is also its patient, as realization of such problem unpleasantly for it.

2

Re:

I consider necessary to consider this point in question.

3

Re:

Mitjajka
Not this main thing. The main thing that I consider necessary to consider.

4

Re:

Mitjajka
Our judgements on the main thing disperse
I consider necessary it to consider first of all.

5

Re:

About what question there is a speech? I ask to quote.

6

Re:

Mitjajka
I think, it could and be issued in the form of inquiry. Directly as is, without changes.

7

Re:

And at this forum the normal participant cannot create the inquiry in any way?

8

Re:

Bitman
The author of a subject if he acquired bonus membership can create inquiry. Inquiry can create and the curator of a subject (now in your subject there is no curator). Also the author can address in  to moderators with the request to create inquiry in a subject, specifying, what the title, what points and other conditions should be. Normally, moderators treat favourably such requests.

9

Re:

Psychologists as a whole very turbid citizens. Repeatedly noted, how psychologists with a clever look " bosh". And this sung in serials, a present mode on psychologists "unmistakably calculating" lie on driving of ears,  a snivel, etc. etc. Generally something is simple.:laugh:

10

Re:

busia
And the boot at them, as a rule, is not present!

11

Re:

At me vague and unpleasant sensation from all it... Crafty something is in psychology.
Bitman
The psychologist on-relation to own problems is "in a situation", it is biassed.
And generally an objectivity question in a science the interesting. The quantum mechanics - a role of the observer smile
The similar question, and whether is necessary the doctor to the doctor?
Psychologists have personal problems, doctors are ill and then the expert, therefore as they in a role of the patient is necessary to them.