1

Topic:

2

Re:

For Russia it only is positive - the tundra recedes, becomes more than suitable territory for residing.

3

Re:

Hello, Ejnstok Fajr, you wrote: > For Russia it only is positive - the tundra recedes, becomes more than suitable territory for residing. Aha, and some island states simply disappear. P.S. It would be desirable to underline that climate changes can faster happen, than it was supposed earlier. , any other researchers predicted achievement of a point of a non-return in the end of it or the beginning of a next century. And new research transfers possible approach of these events approximately on the middle of this century.

4

Re:

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> Researchers paid attention to ten natural processes of back coupling, some of which at achievement of critical level can discompose a situation. These processes while fulfill the useful function - carbon binding, however in case of global warming they can become sources of hotbed gases not giving in to control. We enumerate these ten processes: permafrost thawing, liberation of hydrates of methane from an ocean bottom, easing of a role of sinks (drives) of carbon on a land and at world ocean, gain of bacterial breath at world ocean, dying off of rainforests of Amazonia, dying off  (northern) woods, abbreviation of the area of a snow cover in northern hemisphere, summer abbreviation of the area of sea ice in Arctic regions, abbreviation of the area of sea ice in Antarctic and abbreviation of the area of polar ice boards. Interesting, it in what result of processes? Recently where that read that a principal deterrent of growth of woods is carbonic acid low interest in atmosphere. And growth of a green biomass which should lower level CO2 should be the answer to carbonic acid growth.

5

Re:

6

Re:

> For Russia it only is positive - the tundra recedes, becomes more than suitable territory for residing. It most likely simultaneously means permafrost thawing. And it - with a high probability an ass of planetary scale.

7

Re:

Came across such forecast of dying off of Amazonian woods: Jungle of Amazon is threatened with pure air, scientists - RIA Novosti news agency, 5/8/2008 On a seed consider: In article published in log Nature, the group of researchers of university of the British Exeter and the Brazilian National institute of space researches declares that found out communication between lowering the last years bursts of dioxide of sulfur from burning of coal and growth of temperature of a water surface in Atlantic. Ocean "warming", in turn, increases risk of droughts in jungle of Amazonia." Lowering of level of bursts of connections of sulfur in the North America and Europe leads to that the zone of tropical rains starts to move to the north as northern Atlantic  that sharply increases risk of droughts in pool of Amazon ", - one of authors of operation Chris Hantingford (Chris Huntingford) from Exeter marks. Its words are resulted in the university press release. Particles of connections of sulfur which got to atmosphere at coal burning on power stations, reduced effect of global warming, reflecting solar radiation. This type of pollution prevailed in northern hemisphere and reduced a level of warming of northern part of tropical Atlantic that, in turn, did by more damp a climate of Amazonia.

8

Re:

L>> dying off  (northern) woods T> is interesting, it in what result of processes? Partially because of temperature. In particular, on the north get over new  types as plants and animals.

9

Re:

10

Re:

Hello, andini, you wrote: >> For Russia it only is positive - the tundra recedes, becomes more than suitable territory for residing. A> it most likely simultaneously means permafrost thawing. And it - with a high probability an ass of planetary scale. For us the principal risk is a cold snap.

11

Re:

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> P.S. It would be desirable to underline that climate changes can faster happen, than it was supposed earlier. , any other researchers predicted achievement of a point of a non-return in the end of it or the beginning of a next century. And new research transfers possible approach of these events approximately on the middle of this century. What to devils the non-return point, dinosaurs and crocodiles behind polar circle lived once. Now terrible  if to think.

12

Re:

Hello, GarryIV, you wrote: GIV> What to devils the non-return point, dinosaurs and crocodiles behind polar circle lived once. Now terrible  if to think. On the other hand, the first wave of settling (people) of the central and northern Europe has been completely destroyed by a global cold snap. Actually global warming - our principal friend.

13

Re:

Hello, GarryIV, you wrote: GIV> What to devils the non-return point, dinosaurs and crocodiles behind polar circle lived once. Now terrible  if to think. That to Russian to dinosaurs and crocodiles it is good, to the German [to substitute a proper word] - death. Under a point of a non-return I meant the moment when the climatic system passes in a certain state in which can stick for a long time. By the way, it would be interesting to me to learn, than possible rise of a sea level mentioned in research on 10-60 m. I threatens found online application for visualization of change of coastal outlines at different values of rising of sea level: Sea Level Rise Viewer Unfortunately, it did not turn out to expose value of rising of sea level of more than 6 foots (1,8, and 30-200 foots are expected.

14

Re:

Hello, Mr. Delphist, you wrote: MD>--.jpg Article, I hope, viewed? An essence that mass thawing of ices of Arctic regions and glaciers of Antarctic can happen at our life. Generally they already started to thaw, it is simple still florets.

15

Re:

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> For us the principal risk is a cold snap. Problems of Indians of the sheriff do not excite. And if it is serious, there are schedules on which steady growth of average world temperature for the last some decades is well visible. Glance at least on NASA site: Global Temperature | Vital Signs - Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet I not the alarmist if that, simply climate meanwhile changes towards warming.

16

Re:

Hello, Nik, you wrote: N> On the other hand, the first wave of settling (people) of the central and northern Europe has been completely destroyed by a global cold snap. Actually global warming - our principal friend. I am afraid, all not so is simple. For example, in case of continuation of global warming droughts there where before them almost was not can become frequent (see above about Amazonia). P.S. If in Siberia becomes warmer, it, probably, it will be good for Siberians. But I am not assured that inhabitants of Krasnodar territory or even Moscow and Moscow Region are delighted to warming, say. By the way, what will be with St.-Petersburg and other coastal cities of Russia if the sea level really raises? P.P.S. I any side not , therefore told by me above it is possible to consider all as amateurish delirium.

17

Re:

18

Re:

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> And new research transfers possible approach of these events approximately on the middle of this century. It is very politized subject, I not so would trust any scientists undertaken for it, irrespective of their statements, especially there it is not simple to come to any desirable outputs without quitting the pseudoscientific form.

19

Re:

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> It is very politized subject, I not so would trust any scientists undertaken for it, irrespective of their statements, especially there it is not simple to come to any desirable outputs without quitting the pseudoscientific form. It agree, in this subject of a policy almost more than sciences, however steady growth of average temperature of air hardly is subject to doubt. P.S. Above I gave the reference to page with the schedule of growth of the temperature, allocated on NASA site. And after all recently the USA quitted the Parisian agreement on a climate. P.P.S. The correction: it appears, the USA have no right to quit the Parisian agreement before 2020.

20

Re:

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> It agree, in this subject of a policy almost more than sciences, however steady growth of average temperature of air hardly is subject to doubt. But  that this growth began till 20th century. Anyway glaciers for which watch some centuries started to decrease at least in 19th century, and can and earlier. L> P.P.S. The correction: it appears, the USA have no right to quit the Parisian agreement before 2020. What means have no right? The boy gave a word - the boy a word took reversely. Any country can quit any agreement at any moment. Another matter what to quit on the terms of provided by this agreement nevertheless normally it is better. Or there what internal laws forbid to quit early 2020? Well and them it is possible to cancel, only to Trampu without the consent with legislators of it certainly not to make.

21

Re:

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> I not the alarmist if that, simply climate meanwhile changes towards warming. For history of the Earth it repeatedly changed both towards warming and towards a cold snap. Even for history of existence of Homo of the Sapiens repeatedly changed.

22

Re:

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> But  that this growth began till 20th century. Anyway glaciers for which watch some centuries started to decrease at least in 19th century, and can and earlier. I will remind, an industrial epoch digitize from 1750.

23

Re:

Hello, pagid, you wrote: P> For history of the Earth it repeatedly changed both towards warming and towards a cold snap. Even for history of existence of Homo of the Sapiens repeatedly changed. It was possible to result still  argument with a turkey whom "unexpectedly" decided to kill for Thanksgiving Day. P.S. By the way, on Habre just published fresh article: As our intuition deceives us in questions of global warming (Jerry Mitrovica on Climate Change, the Slowing Rotation of the Earth, and Melting Ice Sheets)

24

Re:

Hello, Lazytech, you wrote: L> Article, I hope, viewed? An essence that mass thawing of ices of Arctic regions and glaciers of Antarctic can happen at our life. And can and not happen.

25

Re:

Hello, anonymous, you wrote: A> And can and not happen. Other researchers speak about a possible global cold snap in the middle of the century because of lowering of solar activity.